Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82971 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2009 16:46:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Sep 2009 16:46:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 54170 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 16:46:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 54100 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2009 16:46:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 54092 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2009 16:46:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:46:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.136.44.57] (HELO smtp102.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (98.136.44.57) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:46:01 +0000 Received: (qmail 63253 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2009 16:45:06 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:X-Mailer; b=SRbHtFl+hBchtAJashqtYQC2UvCLlCgRK7fstBOmixEAtzyoMAY9SpKro8/tBJDeSneWxIO2RrALnHziKF6fZPkqSgezSwlodg94po21fs4TBCwQZ9O3ldC4ebfQkiiSLkz+HCJJu0rw5lAXNAp6UIP7d1xhkk50kvewrhjes0o= ; Received: from 076-076-148-215.pdx.net (david_jencks@76.76.148.215 with plain) by smtp102.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Sep 2009 09:45:05 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: .9oIUzyswBANsYgUm_5uPui0skTnzGJXJQ-- X-YMail-OSG: hHX4wF8VM1kW9qsBGSegCX7I5U6gaXukJmQ8zV_Bdq0ku.JLpNAYxi3xmTkcZnB7Kk38T68eJBsQyacP6MgEGhtTKt7mPCL.LcVbBbPs59eLIf22IPUlVxeXAUlqThw7wCzstcemKx1KJ5bLFGJkxMaZThCPLpplxmaYP.PQ_iL0ecMlxine4OFxDWjjNI.V6OXzsN0HFGZ9k0jy4XTNDkg2k6knXAU6mxfDHuGjKQB1krD0G80Ai6fK X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-Id: <4E5C7280-06AB-4F41-8F98-3E4DF6434E2C@yahoo.com> From: David Jencks To: dev@geronimo.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-17--238402604 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: What's the reason why didn't agent-car-jmx get shipped with geronimo server by default ? Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:45:04 -0700 References: <5e7fd1eb0909131856j15e5e6cbw43bbeeee12f140d9@mail.gmail.com> <708B9FB8-E81E-4683-8C40-0503D7800D0F@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-17--238402604 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sep 14, 2009, at 8:41 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Kevan Miller > wrote: > > On Sep 14, 2009, at 2:52 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: > > Right, I'm planing to ship both of them but mark ejb agent as > "load=false". So that the user will use JMX as default monitoring > agent. > > When the users do not need EJB, they can create a EJB free assembly > easily without breaking the monitoring. > > Does anyone have any other comments ? > > Agreed that this would be more convenient for most users. I don't > recall any specific reason why agent-jmx wasn't included. Vaguely > recall that ejb support was developed first because MEJB support is > required per the EE spec. > Does it mean that we still have to keep ejb agent on by default to > meet the EE spec ? no, the monitoring is not part of the spec so we can use anything we want. thanks david jencks > > --kevan > > > > -- > Shawn --Apple-Mail-17--238402604 Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sep 14, 2009, = at 8:41 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:



On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Kevan Miller = <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sep 14, 2009, at 2:52 AM, Shawn Jiang = wrote:

Right,  I'm planing to ship both of them but mark ejb agent = as "load=3Dfalse".  So that the user will use JMX as default = monitoring agent.

When the users do not need EJB, they can = create a EJB free assembly easily  without breaking the = monitoring.

Does anyone have any other comments ?
=

Agreed that this would be more convenient for = most users. I don't recall any specific reason why agent-jmx wasn't = included. Vaguely recall that ejb support was developed first because = MEJB support is required per the EE spec.
Does it = mean that we still have to keep ejb agent on by default to meet the EE = spec ?

no, the monitoring is = not part of the spec so we can use anything we = want.

thanks
david = jencks


--kevan
=



-- =
Shawn

= --Apple-Mail-17--238402604--