Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 86421 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2009 00:04:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 2009 00:04:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 28345 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2009 00:04:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 28258 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2009 00:04:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 28250 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2009 00:04:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:04:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.195] (HELO mail-yx0-f195.google.com) (209.85.210.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:04:27 +0000 Received: by yxe33 with SMTP id 33so16867yxe.25 for ; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:04:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=AvAg5WwsfBmZbYzkqY+Du1hVTcwrpAioxsDA64h82jQ=; b=d87qO8H8h6X25gK7xbOASGpWF6wuUjJe2ZQEyL9pxkRD8Fi98QQBxIW0xf+SHBsC3x WIeUTBytgyOPqOxbcECl9vGBBJeoMc3OYZ122Gv33UbWu1sks/Lt5pHpmh+kzxcJME+P 8DAazbS1jKR+hsSTlzsyXxBggUemRY9F87ZKw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=KhooPxYOZjQFH0kbBsBnxBvFMCsEdpCr+kK8FeraeT0glfpFvvxpuYHtd1PGUonwNA cMOFLp8CrnuI8+uduWbfzReriwyjknMhs1YJn+qkktBBU6oNSwttoqBDzQ80KSz6W/0M sNNLKeNDoR27LlCzHHBoiGjIWb5o/nlykM/wI= Received: by 10.91.78.19 with SMTP id f19mr7604244agl.95.1252022644944; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:04:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.1.194? (cpe-076-182-095-055.nc.res.rr.com [76.182.95.55]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm888720agc.47.2009.09.03.17.04.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <1FFF3F95-48B8-40E2-87F1-8B65CB06AFEA@gmail.com> From: Kevan Miller To: dev@geronimo.apache.org In-Reply-To: <6AD44F9B-1ABE-4509-B3BC-44EAD62F297F@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: xbean pom parent >> genesis? Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 20:04:01 -0400 References: <6AD44F9B-1ABE-4509-B3BC-44EAD62F297F@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sep 3, 2009, at 5:24 PM, David Jencks wrote: > We need to release a new xbean for geronimo 2.2. Early on genesis > might have been regarded (although not by me) as possibly a little > unstable and overcomplicated but IMO with genesis 2 its pretty > simple, bare-bones, and useful. In particular I would rather not > duplicate stuff in genesis that results in compliant releases. > > So, unless someone objects with a coherent argument I'm planning to > change the xbean pom parent to genesis 2 in preparation for a 3.6 > release. Sounds like a good plan to me. --kevan