Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Message-ID: <1909763461.1252715637541.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: "David Jencks (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4790) Migrate debug-views code to base
 on the up-to-date dojo
In-Reply-To: <1680052796.1249874294830.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12754444#action_12754444 ] 

David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4790:
----------------------------------------

Rex, since we don't know how long it will be until infra gets you your password, could you attach patches?  I think it would be great to get the changes in soon in case there are any hard to find problems.

> Migrate debug-views code to base on the up-to-date dojo
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-4790
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4790
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: console
>    Affects Versions: 2.2
>            Reporter: Rex Wang
>            Assignee: Rex Wang
>             Fix For: 2.2
>
>         Attachments: classloader-viewer.jpg, dependency-viewer.jpg, jmx-viewer.jpg, JNDI-viewer.jpg, ldap-viewer.jpg
>
>
> ref http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Which-dojo--p24293149s134.html
> Currently, our console depends on two different versions of dojo library. One is 1.3.0, which is used by EJB portlet and just updated from 1.2.1 (GERONIMO-4723) and fixed a bug(GERONIMO-4746). I hope we can go on updating it to the latest version 1.3.2.
> The other one is 0.4.3, the legacy lib, which has not been supported  by dojo team, but used by our debug-view portlets, I prefer to update it to the latest lib, and the advantage are as follows:
> 1. keep consistent in the portlet page style with the EJB portlet
> 2. reduce a bit to the geronimo footprint size
> 3. Although we have ported the dojo-legacy to build the source in external(GERONIMO-4750), with this update, we don't need that as well.
> 4. will be more easy to maintainance the program logic by using the unified dojo lib.
> 5. the doc of 1.3.x is good and easy to find.
> There are also some risks:
> 1. There has been so much changes between the dojo versions that the effort might be 1-2 week to complete.
> 2. I did not find any documents for the old dojo lib, so it might be easier to re-write the whole pages to base on 1.3.x and dwr 3.0.x(we have upgrade the dwr successfully in GERONIMO-4753), but I not sure.
> Any thoughts?
> -Rex

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.