geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mohammad Nour El-Din <nour.moham...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VALIDATOR] Proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation Implementation
Date Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:39:02 GMT
I support either solution 1 or 2 from first section of solutions:

1- We will not be waiting for others till they decide whether donate
the code or not.

2- We will get more benefit for ASF as we may gain more committer to
join the community and help grow it more.

3- For the non-committers contribution to the code, I think it is not
a problem as it is the normal case for ASF projects, these
contributions make us gain more committers in the future and hence
more support for ASF.

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Donald Woods<dwoods@apache.org> wrote:
> Everyone, I think it is time again to reopen the discussions around creating
> a Validator2 release [1], which implements the upcoming JSR-303 Bean
> Validation spec [2] and [3].  Since JSR-303 is now a required component of
> Java EE 6 application servers and must be supported by JSR-314 JSF2 and
> JSR-317 JPA2, there is growing interest in the Apache Geronimo, Apache
> OpenJPA, Apache MyFaces and Apache OpenEJB projects to grow and maintain a
> JSR-303 implementation at Apache.
>
> First, to meet this goal, I would like us to consider the following options:
>
> I. - Commons Sandbox
> Utilize the existing validator2 sandbox area [4] to collaborate on a JSR-303
> implementation which would eventually become commons-validator-2.0.
> Pros:  Existing Apache committers can be given access to the sandbox and
> work with the Commons community to become committers.
> Cons:  Non-committers must provide patches and build karma, even before the
> project is moved out of the sandbox (we have interest from two companies to
> help, but most of their potential contributors are not Apache committers.)
>
> II. - Apache Incubator
> Submit an incubator proposal to create a JSR-303 focused project, which
> would be sponsored by the Commons PMC and/or Geronimo PMC with the goal
> being that the candidate proposal would become a sub-project of Commons as
> the new Validator R2 code base.
> Pros:  Allows us to seed the initial project with non-committers and
> demonstrate there is broad support for this project.
> Cons:  Additional incubator proposal and graduation overhead, along with not
> working closely with the whole Commons community on developing the new code
> base.
>
>
> Secondly, we have two existing JSR-303 implementations that we could
> possibly use to help bootstrap this effort:
>
> I. - Agimatec-Validation project on Google Code
> Code uses ASL 2.0 and I have approached one of the Agimatec GmbH employees
> about possibly donating the existing code to Apache.
>
> II. - JSR-303 RI
> Code being developed by Red Hat as the RI using ASL 2.0.  Kevin Sutter from
> the OpenJPA team has approached Emmanuel at Red Hat on this subject, but it
> is doubtful we would see a code donation, but could pull it in as
> third-party code to get started.
>
>
> Please let me know your thoughts, as we would like to get this bootstrapped
> this month, as the Geronimo community is starting to put together our plans
> for a Geronimo 3.0 release in 2010 for a Java EE 6 application server.
>
>
> -Donald Woods
> Apache Geronimo Committer and PMC member
> Apache OpenJPA Committer and PMC member
> dwoods.AT.apache.org
>
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VALIDATOR-279
>
> [2] http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303
>
> [3] http://people.redhat.com/~ebernard/validation/
>
> [4] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/validator2/trunk
>
>



-- 
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
- LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour
----
"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
- Albert Einstein

Mime
View raw message