geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shawn Jiang <genspr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: What's the reason why didn't agent-car-jmx get shipped with geronimo server by default ?
Date Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:19:36 GMT
Fixed this with JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4883

Shawn Jiang resolved GERONIMO-4883.
-----------------------------------

      Resolution: Fixed
   Fix Version/s: 3.0
                  2.2
                  2.1.5

Fixed in 21 branch,22 branch, and trunk.


On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:45 AM, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>wrote:

>
> On Sep 14, 2009, at 8:41 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 14, 2009, at 2:52 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>>
>>  Right,  I'm planing to ship both of them but mark ejb agent as
>>> "load=false".  So that the user will use JMX as default monitoring agent.
>>>
>>> When the users do not need EJB, they can create a EJB free assembly
>>> easily  without breaking the monitoring.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have any other comments ?
>>>
>>
>> Agreed that this would be more convenient for most users. I don't recall
>> any specific reason why agent-jmx wasn't included. Vaguely recall that ejb
>> support was developed first because MEJB support is required per the EE
>> spec.
>>
> Does it mean that we still have to keep ejb agent on by default to meet the
> EE spec ?
>
>
> no, the monitoring is not part of the spec so we can use anything we want.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
>> --kevan
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Shawn
>
>
>


-- 
Shawn

Mime
View raw message