geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shawn Jiang <genspr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: What's the reason why didn't agent-car-jmx get shipped with geronimo server by default ?
Date Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:52:04 GMT
Right,  I'm planing to ship both of them but mark ejb agent as
"load=false".  So that the user will use JMX as default monitoring agent.

When the users do not need EJB, they can create a EJB free assembly easily
without breaking the monitoring.

Does anyone have any other comments ?

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Jack Cai <greensight@gmail.com> wrote:

> So looks like it's a random choice...
>
> If there's no particular reasons (like performance etc.), I'd recommend
> that we use JMX agent as the default instead of the EJB agent, as the latter
> has a dependency on the EJB container.
>
> -Jack
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Shawn Jiang <genspring@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Whenever a user wants to use jmx monitor, he/she needs to install
>> agent-car-jmx plugin firstly.   Why not to ship this plugin with geronimo
>> while keep it "load=false" in config.xml by default ?
>>
>> IMO, this size of agent-car-jmx plugin is only 13Kb.   It's not a problem
>> to bundle it with geronimo server as long as we make it "load=false" by
>> default.
>>
>> Any ideas ?
>>
>> --
>> Shawn
>>
>
>


-- 
Shawn

Mime
View raw message