geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jack Cai <greensi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Proposed tranql svn reorganization
Date Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:57:16 GMT
In this case, how do we do the tag? Just tag each invidiual vendor
connector?

-Jack

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:23 PM, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>wrote:

>
> On Sep 21, 2009, at 8:39 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
>
>
>
> 2009/9/22 Jack Cai <greensight@gmail.com>
>
>> I think it's a good idea. A small problem that I see is currently all the
>> vendor connectors have different version numbers. If we are going to put
>> them under the same folder, shall we bump them to the same version?
>>
> So, if I update one vendor and change its version, I should update all the
> vendors' version?
>
>
> Since the vendor wrappers are not built together, there is no need for them
> to have the same version.
>
> I was actually thinking further of:
> - combining connector and connector-ra into a folder, perhaps "generic"
> - removing the "vendors" folder and having generic, derby, db2,
> postgres,.... next to one another.
>
> But even if we keep the vendors folder the versions don't have to be
> related.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
> -Rex
>
>
>> -Jack
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:41 AM, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I've been irked for a while with the tranql svn organization and just bit
>>> myself by not being careful enough to check the extent of the changes IDEA
>>> made.  I'd like to reorganize svn to make life clearer and simpler.
>>>
>>> 1. There are basically 2 projects, the query language itself which is not
>>> really under active development at the moment, and the j2ca connector
>>> framework which occasionally gets tweaked.  I'd like to separate them.
>>>
>>> 2. We have a lot of foo/bar/trunk type directories.  Our experience in
>>> the geronimo specs projects is that maven 2 has no problem with separately
>>> versioned subprojects all under trunk.
>>>
>>> So, I'd like to propose
>>>
>>> ql/
>>> +/branches
>>> +/tags
>>> +/trunk
>>>
>>> ra/
>>> +/branches
>>> +/tags
>>> +/trunk
>>>
>>>
>>> Under ra/trunk we'd have connector, connector-ra, and the individual
>>> vendor directories such as derby, oracle, etc.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?  In particular does anyone think moving the existing tags will
>>> cause problems?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message