geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jack Cai <greensi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Proposed tranql svn reorganization
Date Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:35:10 GMT
I think it's a good idea. A small problem that I see is currently all the
vendor connectors have different version numbers. If we are going to put
them under the same folder, shall we bump them to the same version?

-Jack

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:41 AM, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>wrote:

> I've been irked for a while with the tranql svn organization and just bit
> myself by not being careful enough to check the extent of the changes IDEA
> made.  I'd like to reorganize svn to make life clearer and simpler.
>
> 1. There are basically 2 projects, the query language itself which is not
> really under active development at the moment, and the j2ca connector
> framework which occasionally gets tweaked.  I'd like to separate them.
>
> 2. We have a lot of foo/bar/trunk type directories.  Our experience in the
> geronimo specs projects is that maven 2 has no problem with separately
> versioned subprojects all under trunk.
>
> So, I'd like to propose
>
> ql/
> +/branches
> +/tags
> +/trunk
>
> ra/
> +/branches
> +/tags
> +/trunk
>
>
> Under ra/trunk we'd have connector, connector-ra, and the individual vendor
> directories such as derby, oracle, etc.
>
> Thoughts?  In particular does anyone think moving the existing tags will
> cause problems?
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>

Mime
View raw message