geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jack Cai <greensi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: What's the reason why didn't agent-car-jmx get shipped with geronimo server by default ?
Date Mon, 14 Sep 2009 09:10:11 GMT
Then we would also need to change the default option when creating a server
to monitor in the monitoring console. Current default is EJB.

-Jack

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Shawn Jiang <genspring@gmail.com> wrote:

> Right,  I'm planing to ship both of them but mark ejb agent as
> "load=false".  So that the user will use JMX as default monitoring agent.
>
> When the users do not need EJB, they can create a EJB free assembly easily
> without breaking the monitoring.
>
> Does anyone have any other comments ?
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Jack Cai <greensight@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So looks like it's a random choice...
>>
>> If there's no particular reasons (like performance etc.), I'd recommend
>> that we use JMX agent as the default instead of the EJB agent, as the latter
>> has a dependency on the EJB container.
>>
>> -Jack
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Shawn Jiang <genspring@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Whenever a user wants to use jmx monitor, he/she needs to install
>>> agent-car-jmx plugin firstly.   Why not to ship this plugin with geronimo
>>> while keep it "load=false" in config.xml by default ?
>>>
>>> IMO, this size of agent-car-jmx plugin is only 13Kb.   It's not a problem
>>> to bundle it with geronimo server as long as we make it "load=false" by
>>> default.
>>>
>>> Any ideas ?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Shawn
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Shawn
>

Mime
View raw message