geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Bohn <>
Subject Re: svn commit: r812965 [1/3] - in /geronimo/daytrader/trunk
Date Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:46:41 GMT
The bean/entity package names is still an open issue.  What I just 
checked in continues uses a common package name for both ... I just 
changed the package name from "org.apache.geronimo.samples.daytrader" to 
"org.apache.geronimo.samples.daytrader.beans".  By doing this we avoid 
the package name conflict with other jars such as core.

So, there is still a conflict between the daytrader-beans and 
daytrader-entities jars. As you pointed out we avoid the conflict in the 
web-jdbc assembly by only including the daytrader-beans.jar.

When just working with jars this isn't an issue (and effectively changes 
nothing for the javaee assemblies).  However we need to resolve this if 
we want to compose an assembly via bundles.  What I checked in is still 
incomplete but begins to make progress on this for the web-jdbc assembly.


Donald Woods wrote:
> Is there some bundle packaging problem that still required package name 
> unique bean vs. entities?  Thought you were going to combine the 
> daytrader/beans files back into daytrader/entities and just pickup the 
> daytrader-beans.jar?
> -Donald
> wrote:
>> Author: jbohn
>> Date: Wed Sep  9 13:57:23 2009
>> New Revision: 812965
>> URL:
>> Log:
>> Qualify package names for modules,  reflect package name updates in 
>> source structure, and bundlize the jars needed for the web jdbc assembly

View raw message