geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Quintin Beukes <quin...@skywalk.co.za>
Subject Re: 2.2 progress
Date Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:13:54 GMT
If the update/review of the LICENSE/NOTICE information is a lot of
work, send some my way if it will help release some of the developer's
time for more important tasks.

Quintin Beukes



On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 21, 2009, at 8:21 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> I think things are moving along for 2.2.
>>
>> - our last internal dependency, the tomcat fork, seems to have passed its
>> vote, although I'd prefer it if Kevan would take a look.
>>
>> - ActiveMQ is pushing release candidates.  The first one showed no tck
>> problems in geronimo.
>>
>> - OpenEJB IIUC is pretty much ready to release.
>
> It looks like OpenEJB has an SFSB problem, which will need to be fixed
> before they release a 3.1.2.
>
>>
>> ---------------
>>
>> Stuff to do:
>>
>> - tranql has been getting some attention lately.  We should try to find a
>> jdbc expert verify the list of non-fatal SQLCodes.  I would like to
>> rearrange tranql svn, but otherwise I'm OK with the code for now.  After we
>> verify stuff works I can release this.
>
> This would be really good, IMO. Will see if I can find somebody to help
> review the SQLCodes.
>
>>
>> - We have a pluto fix that I'm hoping we can duplicate in geronimo
>> somehow.  IIRC we have a couple of pluto driver classes replaced in geronimo
>> already, I hope we can do the same with this pluto fix.  Pushing a pluto 1.x
>> release could be difficult.
>>
>> - We don't know yet whether the maven release plugin and apache-release
>> profile will work with geronimo.
>>
>> - review the jiras carefully.
>
> - update / review LICENSE & NOTICE information.
>
> --kevan
>

Mime
View raw message