geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Release Blueprint 1.0.0
Date Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:40:19 GMT
And another thing... why do we need the servicemix repo listed in the  
root pom?  Shouldn't anything there be on maven central as well?

thanks
david jencks

On Sep 9, 2009, at 10:11 AM, David Jencks wrote:

>
> On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:37 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> Without some major justification I'm seriously -1 on releasing from  
>> the sandbox.  I don't see any problem with moving this code to  
>> components and releasing it from there, whether or not it then  
>> moves somewhere else.
>>
>> Another option is to copy it to servicemix for this release.
>>
>> Here are some nit's I'd prefer to see fixed or explained before  
>> release:
>>
>> 1. Most subprojects' NOTICE file are hardcoded rather than using  
>> appended-resources w/remote-resources-plugin.  Does every non-test  
>> bundle really include non-apache software?
>>
>> 2. the Bundle-Symbolic-Name values are ${artifactId} rather than  
>> the default from the bundle plugin.  I'd really prefer to see  
>> "geronimo" somewhere in the name.
>>
>> 3. I don't understand what most of the stuff in blueprint-bundle  
>> pom.xml is for and I'd prefer to see it explained.  My experiments  
>> lead me to suspect you don't need the maven-shade-plugin.  What is  
>> the motivation for this bundle in the first place?
>>
>> 4. blueprint.xsd is not a geronimo schema but it's under org/apache/ 
>> geronimo/blueprint.
>
> I would think that putting the spec schema(s) in the api jar would  
> be a lot more appropriate.  Is there some reason they aren't  
> included there?
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>>
>> 5. blueprint-api uses jar packaging. Why?
>>
>> In general I'd like to see descriptions in the poms for noobs like  
>> me.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Sep 9, 2009, at 5:27 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Guillaume,
>>> I guess I'd like to have some discussion about this, before  
>>> voting...
>>>
>>> If there's a desire to move this code to the new incubator  
>>> project, I'm not sure why we'd be releasing out of Geronimo, now...
>>>
>>> Also, if we do decide to release, I wouldn't think that we'd want  
>>> the code to be in sandbox.
>>>
>>> --kevan
>>
>


Mime
View raw message