geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rex Wang (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4790) Migrate debug-views code to base on the up-to-date dojo
Date Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:53:57 GMT


Rex Wang closed GERONIMO-4790.

> Migrate debug-views code to base on the up-to-date dojo
> -------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: GERONIMO-4790
>                 URL:
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>          Components: console
>    Affects Versions: 2.2
>            Reporter: Rex Wang
>            Assignee: Rex Wang
>             Fix For: 2.2, 3.0
>         Attachments: classloader-viewer.jpg, dependency-viewer.jpg, jmx-viewer.jpg, JNDI-viewer.jpg,
> ref
> Currently, our console depends on two different versions of dojo library. One is 1.3.0,
which is used by EJB portlet and just updated from 1.2.1 (GERONIMO-4723) and fixed a bug(GERONIMO-4746).
I hope we can go on updating it to the latest version 1.3.2.
> The other one is 0.4.3, the legacy lib, which has not been supported  by dojo team, but
used by our debug-view portlets, I prefer to update it to the latest lib, and the advantage
are as follows:
> 1. keep consistent in the portlet page style with the EJB portlet
> 2. reduce a bit to the geronimo footprint size
> 3. Although we have ported the dojo-legacy to build the source in external(GERONIMO-4750),
with this update, we don't need that as well.
> 4. will be more easy to maintainance the program logic by using the unified dojo lib.
> 5. the doc of 1.3.x is good and easy to find.
> There are also some risks:
> 1. There has been so much changes between the dojo versions that the effort might be
1-2 week to complete.
> 2. I did not find any documents for the old dojo lib, so it might be easier to re-write
the whole pages to base on 1.3.x and dwr 3.0.x(we have upgrade the dwr successfully in GERONIMO-4753),
but I not sure.
> Any thoughts?
> -Rex

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message