Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 25866 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2009 02:09:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Aug 2009 02:09:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 28980 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2009 02:09:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 28899 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2009 02:09:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 28891 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2009 02:09:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 02:09:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.217 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.217] (HELO mail-gx0-f217.google.com) (209.85.217.217) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 02:09:03 +0000 Received: by gxk17 with SMTP id 17so3902109gxk.19 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:08:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=garO38b8ZyebIxaoE6zoVGR1TfSRlGkEURGwDqwFHKM=; b=RBzT1klv1I+e38b0RMUdi6aTw51N38jd899ireWvC54iqHrSLxSuqG6xOmxsrQlpn8 0Vklhvq4YsHQIoMp2ngztvA6ykYGWuu5z/dfegn4WvZ/Sk4tO65VMGslRbBChoM3fcQd nkOOdSC40lwL7NinTkS/IUOak7GA+gwr0mW4A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=IdFvagC+gvpxzlPXzX5uQ8kGD6uvp90q9TCsHRjrxunVojRwVNAtDGVJelyFJLyR/o FXXn5Dn3JZih/hnhgS0I63aLLijuEOXCfvZdFy87sIS80Wmv/pBpKwcE30FxG1d4ZGZ/ TsSxiuW0xITNjjOdd63x/IZWXrRPK+/zkQys0= Received: by 10.150.52.8 with SMTP id z8mr5886272ybz.66.1249092522036; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:08:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.1.7? (cpe-076-182-095-055.nc.res.rr.com [76.182.95.55]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm347328ywh.10.2009.07.31.19.08.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:08:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <3CEF65E4-3D86-4A02-8C4D-4C53CA78841D@gmail.com> From: Kevan Miller To: dev@geronimo.apache.org In-Reply-To: <0BC5CB67-7A79-4749-98FF-9AD706716A3A@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: [BUILD] branches/2.0: Failed for Revision: 799762 Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:08:38 -0400 References: <20090731231923.84049.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <0BC5CB67-7A79-4749-98FF-9AD706716A3A@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jul 31, 2009, at 8:31 PM, David Jencks wrote: > Is there some reason 2.0 needs a tx component snapshot? We need to > make sure anything new we deploy, including snapshots goes to nexus, > not the file based repo. > > I removed the components snapshots from the file based repo earlier > today since one was breaking the trunk build I sure can't see any reason. It looks like 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT dependency was just updated to be 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT. I don't see why it shouldn't be just '2.0.2' I don't see any difference between branches/2.0 and tags/geronimo- txmanager-parent-2.0.2 (beyond version number changes/release activities): svn diff https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/branches/2.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/tags/geronimo-txmanager-parent-2.0.2 I've moved the dependency to 2.0.2. --kevan