geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick McGuire <rick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Webapp Annotation processing for 299
Date Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:07:05 GMT
Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> >>>We'd be interested in any details about what integration work might 
> be needed to add this to Geronimo.
> It is a really fascinating thing that you support us to finish 
> implementation and pass TCK :) We really need a help.
I think there is a great willingness to help you with this, but I was 
looking form something more specific, such as the actual areas/functions 
where integration assistance is needed. 

Rick

>
> Thanks;
>
> --Gurkan
>
> 2009/8/20 Rick McGuire <rickmcg@gmail.com <mailto:rickmcg@gmail.com>>
>
>     Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
>         Hi;
>
>         Thanks for kicking discussion David.
>
>         As you may already know Java EE 6 will be planned to release
>         on  November. Do you have any plan or roadmap  to integrate
>         JSR-299 with Geronimo?
>
>     We have a tentative roadmap for implementing the Web Profile at:
>
>     http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Road+map+for+JEE6+Web+Profile
>
>     For the JEE6 plans, the web profile did not include JSR 299, which
>     I guess has changed recently.  We'd be interested in any details
>     about what integration work might be needed to add this to Geronimo.
>     Rick
>
>
>         We are working hard to implement full specification but it has
>         some parts that requires to integrate with Java EE server tightly.
>
>         Thanks;
>
>         --Gurkan
>
>         2009/8/20 David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com
>         <mailto:david.blevins@visi.com> <mailto:david.blevins@visi.com
>         <mailto:david.blevins@visi.com>>>
>
>
>            I've been talking with Gurkan of OpenWebBeans over on the
>         OpenEJB
>            list and it seemed like a good idea to kick the thread over
>         here
>            as well.
>
>            The long and short of it is that we'll need to scan 299 managed
>            beans at deploy time exactly as we do for JSF.
>
>            Wanted to point him at the JSF scanning code, but can't
>         remember
>            the details.  Anyone remember?  An svn link is fine.
>
>
>            -David
>
>
>
>
>
>
>         -- 
>         Gurkan Erdogdu
>         http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Gurkan Erdogdu
> http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com


Mime
View raw message