Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.211.179 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references
         :x-mailer;
        b=q4sPO74dSN13BxwiI0BwJ+nS+bcZ+ie/99rtuUeRh3vcSuN+oWbcaDHulFB9D3620V
         tCA+4eRMCUKeYJsxcS6Q4G1Fq5etCApHL+iDbmz70H2+wf/Td8q+7Rf/dbo1VbT89P1g
         3oNRKPfX6WVladK4NkFVflWUmnJ3zpFFlftr8=
Message-Id: <CD2E996E-1E11-40ED-99A5-44F422EE7396@gmail.com>
From: Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <C924217F-3DB4-4E4E-979C-1EBB56A6173B@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Subject: Re: [VOTE] jaxb 2.1 spec jar 1.0
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:01:37 -0400
References: <15645DCB-5769-4243-B6CD-10D41383DB27@yahoo.com>
 <FA72CB4B-00A3-41B1-8DCB-A0614AA14DEA@gmail.com>
 <C924217F-3DB4-4E4E-979C-1EBB56A6173B@yahoo.com>


On Jul 27, 2009, at 1:13 PM, David Jencks wrote:

>
> On Jul 27, 2009, at 5:18 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 25, 2009, at 12:49 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Scout is upgrading their maven build and wants to use our spec  
>>> jars, and we need to get several released for 2.2.  The one scout  
>>> needs now is jaxb 2.1.
>>>
>>> We've run the jaxb 2.1 tck on it and it works.
>>>
>>> This is the first release of this spec jar from geronimo.
>>>
>>> I'm having a bit of trouble promoting the uploads in apache nexus  
>>> so for now I put them on people.apache.org: when I figure out how  
>>> to promote them I'll post an updated location.
>>>
>>> Staging site for artifacts:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging/
>>>
>>> Staging site for stie:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/maven/specs/geronimo-jaxb_2.1_spec/1.0/
>>>
>>>
>>> Voting will remain open for 72 hours.
>>
>>
>> Source and signatures look good.
>>
>> The LICENSE and NOTICE file in the source and binary are different.  
>> The source versions contains license and notice information that is  
>> not contained in the binary version. I don't see how that can be  
>> correct. One of the pairs must be wrong. Until this is resolved,  
>> I'm -1.
>
> I looked at svn history.  This spec came from servicemix where it  
> was written entirely by gnodet.  The servicemix svn contains the  
> smaller generic LICENSE and NOTICE files.  Someone added the  
> expanded ones to all our spec projects at some point.
>
> So my conclusion is that the plain vanilla LICENSE and NOTICE files  
> are more correct for this spec project.  I'll update them in trunk.
>
> Now, Apache has a long and unfortunate tradition of including extra  
> crud in LICENSE and NOTICE files.  Much as I don't like  
> participating in this tradition I'm not sure I think this one is  
> worth rerolling the release for.
>
> I'll ask the scout folks if they can run their release vote  
> concurrently with this vote -- if they can I'll re-roll this one.

Thanks a bunch for digging through svn history. That makes sense. I'd  
prefer to see updated license/notice files. If only license/notice are  
being updated, I'm not sure a new, full 72-hour vote would be required.

--kevan