Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <24492704.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Forrest_Xia <forrestxm@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: The scope and schedule for G 2.2 samples release
In-Reply-To: <958267E7-84E4-453B-A576-8D7428398D85@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <24177645.post@talk.nabble.com> <24177765.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <5e7fd1eb0906242127n608c2c85p6320f4f78bec0f51@mail.gmail.com>
 <24386489.post@talk.nabble.com> <24455766.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <958267E7-84E4-453B-A576-8D7428398D85@yahoo.com>


djencks wrote:
> 
> Isn't jsf pretty much a struts replacement?  I kinda thought struts  
> and struts 2 were obsolete after jsf came out.
> Activemq broker and the apache directory plugin both show using spring  
> in geronimo, although not as end-user apps.
> 

The reason I add this is that I saw user asking how-to about using
struts/spring in geronimo for several times in the mailing list or related
forum. So I think it might be helpful if we have a sample about it. 
For JSF, let me check if we have some available code to contribute.


djencks wrote:
> 
>> 4. Add or update a sample to demo JTA
> ???  do you mean how to use UserTransaction?
> 

I'm a little bit confusing here too. Cause I think there are some codes in
daytrader using JTA. We may make it clear as progress is forward.


djencks wrote:
> 
> CSA?
> 
CSA shorts for Custom Server Assembly :-)


djencks wrote:
> 
>> 7. Figure out a way to release JEE application ear/war balls of G  
>> samples.
> 
> IIRC the missing bit is the geronimo plan.  I don't think there is an  
> absolute requirement that the plan be inside the javaee application.   
> So I think I would pursue this goal by seeing if we can get the car- 
> maven-plugin to deploy the processed plan as an attached artifact.   
> This will result in separate jetty and tomcat plans which I think is OK.
> 
Can you explain more about using car-maven-plugin to deploy the processed
plan as an attached artifact? how will it work? thanks!


djencks wrote:
> 
>> 8. Ensure G 2.1.2 samples plugins installable and functionable on G  
>> 2.2
>> server.
> 
> This is not possible due to the large number of class changes in  
> gbeans such as the jetty web app context gbean.
> 
So cancel this.


djencks wrote:
> 
>> I am going to work on this list and open a JIRA to track it, and  
>> will post
>> my progress to this thread from time to time. Welcome any comments!
> 
> Great to see someone working on this!
> 
Glad to be helpful somewhat

Regards, Forrest


-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/The-scope-and-schedule-for-G-2.2-samples-release-tp24177645s134p24492704.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.