Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:X-Mailer;
  b=qm7RyxXmZ7ngI8VasS2puf5nr3McRCvQI0kwQeRZKqo4jaVlwEjYbrpiqC0D65lbeKXUWKdGsaxqhaqmZigykSq07NSJmyyuHsPrOF3eWluIzhiffDd+gyAf0CPBFKnXW7YL6fXkR+/Y6bU+vNAJuROjGs7sh68eEuC2rUxtHXg=
  ;
Message-Id: <0D1C7BB2-FF39-45BF-98CF-9E407E712AC0@yahoo.com>
From: David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <98a659de0907272337p1a2b9025u3be31dd36ba5212b@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Subject: Re: Why the resource adapter deployed via console is not a geronimo
  configuration(.car)?
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:00:01 -0700
References: <98a659de0907272337p1a2b9025u3be31dd36ba5212b@mail.gmail.com>

I thought we had successfully tracked down all the console bits that  
didn't create car files.  Could you please file a jira issue for 2.2?   
If you can figure out a patch that would be even better :-)

thanks
david jencks
On Jul 27, 2009, at 11:37 PM, chi runhua wrote:

> Hi all,
> I was trying to review some topics in G22 doc and ran into some  
> confusion as below. Hope someone could shed me some light on this.
>
> Here is the scenario:
> A user wants to convert his applications into geronimo-plugins, and  
> he prefers to the admin console.  The datasource pool was deployed  
> via console wizard which is a .rar type. But He wasn't able to  
> export the resource adapter directly because only the geronimo  
> configuration(.car) can be exported now.  So he need to delete the  
> resouce adapter and deploy its plan again by specifying type as car.
>
> If that's the case, why the console wizard cann't deploy the  
> resource adapter as a geronimo configuration at the first place?
>
> Thanks  in advance.
>
> Jeff C