geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shawn Jiang <genspr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Should we filter those unimportant log out from current server log ?
Date Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:32:33 GMT
I upload a patch to remove some extra log here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4712

Can anyone give any comments ?  Thanks in advance.


On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Shawn Jiang <genspring@gmail.com> wrote:

> For those log in specific class or package.  We can remove them through
> log4j config file.
> But for those we want to remove part of them in a class.  We have to modify
> the code.  I've opened a JIRA:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4712 to track this.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Jack Cai <greensight@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree. Some "INFO" in the current log are not very useful.
>>
>> Other than changing the log level in the code, another option is to modify
>> the default log4j configuration file, which might be easier to do.
>>
>> -Jack
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Shawn Jiang <genspring@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I believe there are some log that needs to be filtered out from current
>>> server log because they are not good/useful information as part of default
>>> INFO in log.   All these kind of log messages could do is to bury the useful
>>> info or to mislead the new users.
>>>
>>>
>>> Some sample of them are:
>>>
>>>
>>> 2009-06-12 16:53:55,171 INFO  [PortletContextManager] Registering 24
>>> portlets for context /console-base
>>> 2009-06-12 16:53:55,203 INFO  [PortletContextManager] Portlet application
>>> with application id '/console-base' already registered.
>>> 2009-06-12 16:53:55,203 INFO  [PortletContextManager] Registering 24
>>> portlets for context /console-base
>>> 2009-06-12 16:53:55,234 INFO  [PortletContextManager] Portlet application
>>> with application id '/console-base' already registered.
>>> 2009-06-12 16:53:55,234 INFO  [PortletContextManager] Registering 24
>>> portlets for context /console-base
>>> 2009-06-12 16:53:55,265 INFO  [PortletContextManager] Portlet application
>>> with application id '/console-base' already registered.
>>> .........
>>>
>>>
>>> 2009-06-23 13:22:36,484 INFO  [XSRFHandler] Created session for uid=null
>>> with sessionId=2486E123C24B5E399859E9F5BAFD95BD,
>>> uniqueId=-7432393335768912086
>>> 2009-06-23 13:22:36,546 INFO  [XSRFHandler] Updated HTML content with
>>> XSRF JavaScript for requestURI=/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe we could just redirect them to another log file or just change
>>> these kind of message to DEBUG from current INFO.   Anyway, we must make
>>> sure the default log be *concise *and only contain important info *that
>>> users want to know*.
>>>
>>> Any  comments ?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Shawn
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Shawn
>



-- 
Shawn

Mime
View raw message