geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Do we want to apply genesis 2.0 resource filtering best practice ?
Date Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:49:47 GMT

On Jul 16, 2009, at 1:52 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:

> Thanks for your replies, I'll go ahead to submit patches on this.

Can you do this in the form of patches for pom files and a file of svn  
mv commands for actually moving the resources?  That way we won't lose  
the svn history of the resources.

thanks
david jencks

>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com>  
> wrote:
> Me too :-)  I guess that is why I put that in there, just never  
> updated projects to use it.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Jul 16, 2009, at 1:08 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 15, 2009, at 10:46 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed there's a maven resource best practice defined in  
>>> genesis-default-flava-2.0.pom.
>>>
>>> 1, Put normal resource under : ${project.basedir}/ src/main/ 
>>> resources
>>> 2, Put the resource that needs filtering under: ${project.basedir}/
>>> src/main/filtered-resources
>>>
>>> At the same time, many projects in Geronimo does not follow this  
>>> practice.  A JIRA was opened for this : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4737
>>>
>>> If no objection, I'm going to use GERONIMO-4737 to fix this kind  
>>> of problems in current code base.   Any comments ?
>>
>> Looks like a good idea to me!
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>> -- 
>>> Shawn
>>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Shawn


Mime
View raw message