Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63827 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2009 18:52:31 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jun 2009 18:52:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 89857 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2009 18:52:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 89773 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2009 18:52:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 89765 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2009 18:52:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:52:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.13.13.47] (HELO smtp108.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (76.13.13.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:52:30 +0000 Received: (qmail 94376 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2009 18:52:09 -0000 Received: from cpe-174-099-058-061.nc.res.rr.com (dwoods@174.99.58.61 with plain) by smtp108.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Jun 2009 11:52:09 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: sCI.ryiswBB7FW.DxjU523c87MI- X-YMail-OSG: o4SUD78VM1lODgCe4MheTV8T6fiVjdXdHEXajYcXOvc4AfowBoOnnl9_OFuqFu0khKAmpYcyngEVk1p3FG2zNJwD9cbWBS2w7Yvp95pzuJBz2IaeZRfMRSPvMcu3d.TsgA0QMF4PIPuTJItEyAIYqpWYrDnomE0me6gLjMU5xesSS8VgOMcoS1EEyhKF3XaUgOCG8a1U4UwvG6hxCE6BGtk18IzDDiCJBp1faT3t.yLTZYhT5nb6ZumuZ5wHps0hUGWcZbg7Fncir98P_mhqbC3xaJB9TQw0..Q3ez_UkQ3_GGYPDBh2NzfXq.eODGWUk72C_cYWHeTBzg-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4A43C759.7000808@apache.org> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:52:09 -0400 From: Donald Woods User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Eliminating the svn repo References: <4A421158.1050504@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4A421158.1050504@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Only repo I can find dwr-2.0.5 in, is in the Atlassian repo at - https://maven.atlassian.com/3rdparty/org/directwebremoting/dwr/2.0.5/ -Donald Donald Woods wrote: > For DWR, we need 2.0.5 to fix known security vulnerabilities in earlier > versions. > > > -Donald > > David Jencks wrote: >> The svn repo is a terrible idea and violates the principle that all >> the dependencies of anything in the maven central repo, must be in the >> maven central repo. I've been working to remove the need for stuff in >> there with some success. >> >> What's left is: >> >> jtidy. This appears to be a dependency only of the >> testsuite-maven-plugin. The project is not very active, although it >> is built with maven 2. Does anyone know what exactly it's used for? >> Can we get rid of it? Otherwise I guess we'll have to see if we can >> get the project to release something. >> >> directwebremoting. Our version (2.0.5) appears to have been released >> but not to a maven repo. There's a 3.0.M1 released milestone. I >> suggest we try it and see if it works for us. Does anyone know if the >> 2.0.3 version would work? >> >> dojo. I don't know what's in our 0.4.3 dojo-ajax and 1.1.1 dojo-mini >> jars but I see maven releases of dojo-war at 1.1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 Maybe >> we can extract what we need from this. Are we still using the 0.4.3 >> stuff? There's a 0.4.3 dojo-rhino jar..... maybe it's related. >> >> thanks >> david jencks >> >