Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 89398 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2009 15:12:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2009 15:12:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 65773 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 15:13:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 65627 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2009 15:12:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 65487 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2009 15:12:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:12:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.24 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.24] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:12:43 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so913094qwh.25 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:12:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=KSezc3Mi7SXQaGJGdxO1GIjuutAIagjWWRSZs33Wjlc=; b=RGR5ZWAiHc+77R9hGRg9JFMjglMtkqo5XzrUOa0/M/Auh8cz/GOGgsfFjS/Y/SPTSI ij0Cy/svrWWfkwIFnpa4g7ZLxUGqXhP9VSOvX+xML1FLdc9Y8GhMWzX3wj51t8CNlUwd BroDqcSDQwj9QydOE2pykkD0NlEUswOyoLqtw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=QBPfQ0T+R0Sm+SY2uHefHdYbzSFoZ+Bfbbb5x+wxvYq3eJWxZEPkhkYoqZ0JbnoiFC xeIU5WEpuUAS5ja2CzWDHZAxzRXAfYKtO+Z4OJUHb0WeuiUvPxtuSo14ADR8u5sFYGWi AkHmlkgwPTMQZYWckKUCgOMJNTit74jchMXDo= Received: by 10.220.100.194 with SMTP id z2mr2664507vcn.38.1245424342467; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:12:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.1.7? (cpe-076-182-095-055.nc.res.rr.com [76.182.95.55]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm312472ywg.15.2009.06.19.08.12.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <143F9322-C86C-47F9-96F8-E961209524C2@gmail.com> From: Kevan Miller To: dev@geronimo.apache.org In-Reply-To: <5e7fd1eb0906182331v7da1e556wd9004dd872e1864f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: Possible for G to directly consume a Tomcat server config w/o changes? Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:12:19 -0400 References: <4A11BBDB.1010101@gmail.com> <45f744e40906150107u46059ed1p25e90c2ead34eaf4@mail.gmail.com> <45f744e40906150150i1ee6ecd6wda2249370fd6945d@mail.gmail.com> <45f744e40906150316y3d3fb5ay1743be7d2095b41f@mail.gmail.com> <5019A1D4-18E9-425A-ADF7-8F24A32C755B@yahoo.com> <45f744e40906151905i7626ebe6u9b5cc68352c89a50@mail.gmail.com> <0B801DB9-94CB-404D-A53F-A80AC87AF164@yahoo.com> <45f744e40906160000w4d69230xfd0986e6a99b9e9e@mail.gmail.com> <45f744e40906180036o36399948y3a47e09466b795a4@mail.gmail.com> <5e7fd1eb0906182331v7da1e556wd9004dd872e1864f@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 19, 2009, at 2:31 AM, Jack Cai wrote: > Looks like this is going be a piece of non-trivial work. Considering > that we are going for a 2.2 release, should we re-evaluate whether > this feature should be in 2.2? My gut feeling is no. We should > really stablize the code and resovle TCK issues. If it's *hard* to add the SSL connector configuration, then something is clearly wrong. Personally, I'd be pretty interested in seeing this type of support in 2.2. The more Tomcat apps/configurations that just run on Geronimo, the better off we are... --kevan