geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rex Wang <rwo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Update the 2.2 release status page?
Date Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:23:34 GMT
How frequent do you think is the most appropriate for Geronimo?
IMHO, too more releases in a year might give users the impression that the
production is very young and not stable.


Thank you
-Rex

2009/6/15 Juergen Weber <weberjn@gmail.com>

>
> Hi,
>
> I think it would be a pity for 2.2 to appear only in 4Q2009 (hope, this
> doesn't mean XMas ;-)
>
> Generally, I feel Geronimo's release cycles should be faster:
> - Users would get bug fixes much earlier (there appeared several
> interesting
> fixes on the list here in the last weeks)
> - there would be more and earlier feedback for new features (and new bugs)
> - release early, release often
> - the Geronimo web site would show more signs of life and the whole project
> would look more active when there are more often News entries
> - Getting a new release is like unwrapping a gift 8-)
>
> I am not sure how much more work shorter release cycles would mean for the
> Geronimo team. But shouldn't it suffice to automatically build and run the
> testsuite, at least for minor releases?
>
> Thanks you,
> Juergen
>
>
>
>
> Rex Wang-2 wrote:
> >
> > HI
> >
> > I notice a user in mail list who complained that the
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-22-release-status.html is out
> of
> > date.
> >>Ashwill, Steve (Facilities & Services)
> >>Hello,
> >>Can anyone tell me if there is a new roadmap in the works defining a
> > release schedule for version 2.2.  We have been developing based on the
> > Geronimo 2.2 Release Status(OpenEJB 3.1), but if it will >not be released
> > in
> > the next few months we may need to re-factor to 2.1.4.  Our support folks
> > are a bit hesitant to deploy to production using a snapshot version.
>  I’ve
> > checked
> > http://cwiki.apache.org>>>/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-22-release-status.html
> > , but it has not been updated in a while.
> >>Any guessimation as to when and if 2.2 will be released would be greatly
> > appreciated.
> >>Thanks,
> >>Steve
> >
> > I think at least the dates following should update, can anyone help?
> > Release Manager:
> > Proposed Branch/freeze date: 12/12/08 1/9/09 1Q2009    ->  3Q2009
> > Proposed Release Candidate: 1/9/09 1/16/09 1Q2009    ->  4Q2009
> > Proposed Release date: 1/15/09 1/30/09 1Q2009    ->  4Q2009
> >
> >
> > -Rex
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Update-the-2.2-release-status-page--tp24030920s134p24032328.html
> Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Mime
View raw message