On Jun 21, 2009, at 10:20 PM, Ivan wrote:
>
>
> 2009/6/22 David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
>
> On Jun 19, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Ivan wrote:
>
>> Currently, what I can see are
>> 1. Recover those configurations that we used for Tomcat in the
>> server.xml
>
> For connectors, I may have done most of this in my work for (3)....
> could use some checking. I'd also like to see if I can make the
> tomcat connectors use our thread pool -- a new feature I've wanted
> for years :-)
>
>> 2. Update the console codes, and decide whether we need to keep the
>> functions like add/remove connectors. If keep, the way we do it is
>> to add/remove ConnectorGBean or to marshall/remarshall server.xml.
>> 3. Make those settings in the server.xml not hardcoded.
>
> I implemented this here, not sure if I'll get it committed today or
> tomorrow
I committed this in rev 787153. I exposed the replacement code the
local attribute manager uses. I'm thinking of modifying the activemq
integration to use this method instead of spring property substitution.
>
>> 4. Recover those GBeans that console/other components used, such as
>> AccessLogValve etc.
>
> Maybe the AccessLogValve can fish its valve out of the server like
> the engine gbean now does?
>
> I will try to do it, Valve is a bit different with the Engine,
> for it has no name attribute, and Engine/Host all could hold to a
> list of them.
> My way is to use the "seq" to identify it, like what it is done
> by its object name.
Looking forward to seeing this!
thanks
david jencks
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
>> I would like to work at parts of them, if we have decided to import
>> this feature in 2.2. And I suggest that we open a JIRA for each of
>> them, so that we could track them clearly.
>> Thanks !
>> Ivan
>>
>> 2009/6/20 David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
>> After fixing the HostGBean in web app plan problem I don't have a
>> very clear idea of what's missing here. If one of you do could you
>> please list in detail what needs to be done?
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Ivan wrote:
>>
>>> It is easy to add the SSL connector, the things that Jack concens
>>> is that, how do the changes affect other components, I think.
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>> 2009/6/19 Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> On Jun 19, 2009, at 2:31 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
>>>
>>> Looks like this is going be a piece of non-trivial work.
>>> Considering that we are going for a 2.2 release, should we re-
>>> evaluate whether this feature should be in 2.2? My gut feeling is
>>> no. We should really stablize the code and resovle TCK issues.
>>>
>>> If it's *hard* to add the SSL connector configuration, then
>>> something is clearly wrong. Personally, I'd be pretty interested
>>> in seeing this type of support in 2.2. The more Tomcat apps/
>>> configurations that just run on Geronimo, the better off we are...
>>>
>>> --kevan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ivan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ivan
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
|