geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: Default war deployed w/o plan gets /WebApp_ID context?
Date Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:08:33 GMT
I have to retract this with some shame... *blush*

I didn't realize that all of the silly webapps I was testing had their  
<web-app id="WebApp_ID" ...

OMG.

--jason


On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:29 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

> Even a random context would be better than always using "/ 
> WebApp_ID"... but I would imagine that it should first try and  
> create a unique context from the filename, encoding muck as needed.   
> Otherwise, how about something more like "/webapp<counter>".
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>
>> Agreed, use war file name as the default context  is a good start.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Ivan <xhhsld@gmail.com> wrote:
>> WebApp_ID is not so friendly, not sure when it begins, this should  
>> be improved, maybe we could use the war file's name as the default  
>> context.
>>
>> 2009/6/16 Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com>
>> Aren't we trying to do something a little bit more intelligent  
>> about picking a context for deployed wars w/o a plan.xml?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Seems like all of these "default/..." wars want to mount under / 
>> WebApp_ID... forcing me to make a plan for them, just to set the  
>> context.
>>
>> Is this how it always worked?
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Ivan
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Shawn
>


Mime
View raw message