geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jarek Gawor <jga...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: jaxws 2.2 spec jar....
Date Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:07:48 GMT
David J.,

I was thinking (one we're done with all the changes) to release it as
1.0-EA (with vote and everything).

Jarek

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:21 PM, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I bundlized it.
>
> Are you happy with snapshots getting pushed or do you need a "M!" type release with a
vote and everything?
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Jun 16, 2009, at 6:39 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>>
>> Jarek,
>>
>> I don't think I'm going to have any more time to add javadocs or anything.
>> Thus, it's current state is probably the best that will be there for a while.
>> Could you go ahead and move it back to G and do whatever updates are needed
>> for a "alpha" release?
>>
>> Major thanks!
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> On Mon June 15 2009 10:40:43 am Jarek Gawor wrote:
>>>
>>> Dan,
>>>
>>> Let me know when you think you are done with it and I'll move it to
>>> Geronimo.
>>>
>>> Thanks for working on this, btw.
>>>
>>> Jarek
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Daniel Kulp<dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri June 12 2009 5:23:42 pm David Jencks wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> What would your thought be on moving it to the geronimo spec project
>>>>> once it isn't having daily changes?
>>>>
>>>> Actually, with Dims' help, we're now there.   I ran the tool Harmony used
>>>> to compare API's and we're now 100% compatible with the jaxws 2.2 api
>>>> jar.  Now, that is not the same as running the TCK (which we don't have
>>>> yet), but definitely a promising sign.    I think I want to spend a
>>>> little time early next week adding some javadoc, but then it would be
>>>> good to move it back to geronimo-specs and do an "alpha" release.
>>>> (wouldn't call it a 1.0 release until we have a tck to test it).
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>> I'm planning to release the jaxb 2.1 spec jar soon for geronimo 2.2.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> david jencks
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 12, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri June 12 2009 3:42:23 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Dan, we need it for axis2 as well. Looks like we need
2.2 of
>>>>>>> JAXB as
>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm slightly less concerned about JAXB for right now for three
>>>>>> reasons:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) It's available in the Sun maven repos already (and now
>>>>>> central ;-) )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2) We never have had a JAXB 2.1 version released yet.   We've always
>>>>>> used the
>>>>>> Sun version anyway.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3) We don't have an Apache implementation of JAXB so we need the
Sun
>>>>>> implementation anyway.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, a JAXB 2.2 version would be nice, but not critical right now.
>>>>>> JAX-WS
>>>>>> 2.2 is slightly critical as there isn't a version deployed in maven
>>>>>> that we
>>>>>> can start using as a starting point.   We need SOMETHING that we
can
>>>>>> use
>>>>>> pretty much ASAP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- dims
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 06/12/2009 03:35 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just to let everyone know, I've started working on creating
a
>>>>>>>> specs jar
>>>>>>>> for jaxws 2.2 in the CXF sandbox:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All apache committers can commit there so if anyone wants
to help
>>>>>>>> out...
>>>>>>>> ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mostly just wanted to let folks know I've started it so someone
else
>>>>>>>> doesn't go off and start it as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>> dkulp@apache.org
>>>>>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>> dkulp@apache.org
>>>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dkulp@apache.org
>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Mime
View raw message