geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: jaxws 2.2 spec jar....
Date Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:21:08 GMT
I bundlized it.

Are you happy with snapshots getting pushed or do you need a "M!" type  
release with a vote and everything?

thanks
david jencks

On Jun 16, 2009, at 6:39 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:

>
> Jarek,
>
> I don't think I'm going to have any more time to add javadocs or  
> anything.
> Thus, it's current state is probably the best that will be there for  
> a while.
> Could you go ahead and move it back to G and do whatever updates are  
> needed
> for a "alpha" release?
>
> Major thanks!
>
> Dan
>
> On Mon June 15 2009 10:40:43 am Jarek Gawor wrote:
>> Dan,
>>
>> Let me know when you think you are done with it and I'll move it to
>> Geronimo.
>>
>> Thanks for working on this, btw.
>>
>> Jarek
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Daniel Kulp<dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri June 12 2009 5:23:42 pm David Jencks wrote:
>>>> What would your thought be on moving it to the geronimo spec  
>>>> project
>>>> once it isn't having daily changes?
>>>
>>> Actually, with Dims' help, we're now there.   I ran the tool  
>>> Harmony used
>>> to compare API's and we're now 100% compatible with the jaxws 2.2  
>>> api
>>> jar.  Now, that is not the same as running the TCK (which we don't  
>>> have
>>> yet), but definitely a promising sign.    I think I want to spend a
>>> little time early next week adding some javadoc, but then it would  
>>> be
>>> good to move it back to geronimo-specs and do an "alpha" release.
>>> (wouldn't call it a 1.0 release until we have a tck to test it).
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>> I'm planning to release the jaxb 2.1 spec jar soon for geronimo  
>>>> 2.2.
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>> david jencks
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 12, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>>> On Fri June 12 2009 3:42:23 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks Dan, we need it for axis2 as well. Looks like we need  
>>>>>> 2.2 of
>>>>>> JAXB as
>>>>>> well.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm slightly less concerned about JAXB for right now for three
>>>>> reasons:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) It's available in the Sun maven repos already (and now
>>>>> central ;-) )
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) We never have had a JAXB 2.1 version released yet.   We've  
>>>>> always
>>>>> used the
>>>>> Sun version anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>> 3) We don't have an Apache implementation of JAXB so we need the  
>>>>> Sun
>>>>> implementation anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, a JAXB 2.2 version would be nice, but not critical right now.
>>>>> JAX-WS
>>>>> 2.2 is slightly critical as there isn't a version deployed in  
>>>>> maven
>>>>> that we
>>>>> can start using as a starting point.   We need SOMETHING that we  
>>>>> can
>>>>> use
>>>>> pretty much ASAP.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan
>>>>>
>>>>>> -- dims
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06/12/2009 03:35 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>>>>> Just to let everyone know, I've started working on creating a
>>>>>>> specs jar
>>>>>>> for jaxws 2.2 in the CXF sandbox:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All apache committers can commit there so if anyone wants to
 
>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>> out...
>>>>>>> ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mostly just wanted to let folks know I've started it so  
>>>>>>> someone else
>>>>>>> doesn't go off and start it as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>> dkulp@apache.org
>>>>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Kulp
>>> dkulp@apache.org
>>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
> -- 
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Mime
View raw message