geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ivan <xhh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Possible for G to directly consume a Tomcat server config w/o changes?
Date Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:20:46 GMT
2009/6/22 David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>

>
> On Jun 19, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Ivan wrote:
>
> Currently, what I can see are
> 1. Recover those configurations that we used  for Tomcat in the server.xml
>
>
> For connectors, I may have done most of this in my work for (3).... could
> use some checking.  I'd also like to see if I can make the tomcat connectors
> use our thread pool -- a new feature I've wanted for years :-)
>
> 2. Update the console codes, and decide whether we need to keep the
> functions like add/remove connectors. If keep, the way we do it is to
> add/remove ConnectorGBean or to marshall/remarshall server.xml.
> 3. Make those settings in the server.xml not hardcoded.
>
>
> I implemented this here, not sure if I'll get it committed today or
> tomorrow
>
> 4. Recover those GBeans that console/other components used, such as
> AccessLogValve etc.
>
>
> Maybe the AccessLogValve can fish its valve out of the server like the
> engine gbean now does?
>

   I will try to do it, Valve is a bit different with the Engine, for it has
no name attribute, and Engine/Host all could hold to a list of them.
   My way is to use the "seq" to identify it, like what it is done by its
object name.

>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
> I would like to work at parts of them, if we have decided to import this
> feature in 2.2. And I suggest that we open a JIRA for each of them, so that
> we could track them clearly.
> Thanks !
> Ivan
>
> 2009/6/20 David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
>
>> After fixing the HostGBean in web app plan problem I don't have a very
>> clear idea of what's missing here.  If one of you do could you please list
>> in detail what needs to be done?
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Ivan wrote:
>>
>> It is easy to add the SSL connector, the things that Jack concens is that,
>> how do the changes affect other components, I think.
>> Ivan
>>
>> 2009/6/19 Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 19, 2009, at 2:31 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
>>>
>>>  Looks like this is going be a piece of non-trivial work. Considering
>>>> that we are going for a 2.2 release, should we re-evaluate whether this
>>>> feature should be in 2.2? My gut feeling is no. We should really stablize
>>>> the code and resovle TCK issues.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If it's *hard* to add the SSL connector configuration, then something is
>>> clearly wrong. Personally, I'd be pretty interested in seeing this type of
>>> support in 2.2. The more Tomcat apps/configurations that just run on
>>> Geronimo, the better off we are...
>>>
>>> --kevan
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ivan
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
>
>
>


-- 
Ivan

Mime
View raw message