geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>
Subject Re: Default war deployed w/o plan gets /WebApp_ID context?
Date Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:29:41 GMT
Even a random context would be better than always using "/ 
WebApp_ID"... but I would imagine that it should first try and create  
a unique context from the filename, encoding muck as needed.   
Otherwise, how about something more like "/webapp<counter>".

--jason


On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:

> Agreed, use war file name as the default context  is a good start.
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Ivan <xhhsld@gmail.com> wrote:
> WebApp_ID is not so friendly, not sure when it begins, this should  
> be improved, maybe we could use the war file's name as the default  
> context.
>
> 2009/6/16 Jason Dillon <jason@planet57.com>
> Aren't we trying to do something a little bit more intelligent about  
> picking a context for deployed wars w/o a plan.xml?
>
>
>
>
>
> Seems like all of these "default/..." wars want to mount under / 
> WebApp_ID... forcing me to make a plan for them, just to set the  
> context.
>
> Is this how it always worked?
>
> --jason
>
>
>
> -- 
> Ivan
>
>
>
> -- 
> Shawn


Mime
View raw message