geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
Subject Re: jaxws 2.2 spec jar....
Date Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:39:41 GMT

Jarek,

I don't think I'm going to have any more time to add javadocs or anything.   
Thus, it's current state is probably the best that will be there for a while.   
Could you go ahead and move it back to G and do whatever updates are needed 
for a "alpha" release?  

Major thanks!

Dan

On Mon June 15 2009 10:40:43 am Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Dan,
>
> Let me know when you think you are done with it and I'll move it to
> Geronimo.
>
> Thanks for working on this, btw.
>
> Jarek
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Daniel Kulp<dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
> > On Fri June 12 2009 5:23:42 pm David Jencks wrote:
> >> What would your thought be on moving it to the geronimo spec project
> >> once it isn't having daily changes?
> >
> > Actually, with Dims' help, we're now there.   I ran the tool Harmony used
> > to compare API's and we're now 100% compatible with the jaxws 2.2 api
> > jar.  Now, that is not the same as running the TCK (which we don't have
> > yet), but definitely a promising sign.    I think I want to spend a
> > little time early next week adding some javadoc, but then it would be
> > good to move it back to geronimo-specs and do an "alpha" release.  
> > (wouldn't call it a 1.0 release until we have a tck to test it).
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >> I'm planning to release the jaxb 2.1 spec jar soon for geronimo 2.2.
> >>
> >> thanks
> >> david jencks
> >>
> >> On Jun 12, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >> > On Fri June 12 2009 3:42:23 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >> >> Thanks Dan, we need it for axis2 as well. Looks like we need 2.2 of
> >> >> JAXB as
> >> >> well.
> >> >
> >> > I'm slightly less concerned about JAXB for right now for three
> >> > reasons:
> >> >
> >> > 1) It's available in the Sun maven repos already (and now
> >> > central ;-) )
> >> >
> >> > 2) We never have had a JAXB 2.1 version released yet.   We've always
> >> > used the
> >> > Sun version anyway.
> >> >
> >> > 3) We don't have an Apache implementation of JAXB so we need the Sun
> >> > implementation anyway.
> >> >
> >> > Yes, a JAXB 2.2 version would be nice, but not critical right now.
> >> > JAX-WS
> >> > 2.2 is slightly critical as there isn't a version deployed in maven
> >> > that we
> >> > can start using as a starting point.   We need SOMETHING that we can
> >> > use
> >> > pretty much ASAP.
> >> >
> >> > Dan
> >> >
> >> >> -- dims
> >> >>
> >> >> On 06/12/2009 03:35 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >> >>> Just to let everyone know, I've started working on creating a
> >> >>> specs jar
> >> >>> for jaxws 2.2 in the CXF sandbox:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec/
> >> >>>
> >> >>> All apache committers can commit there so if anyone wants to help
> >> >>> out...
> >> >>> ;-)
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Mostly just wanted to let folks know I've started it so someone
else
> >> >>> doesn't go off and start it as well.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Daniel Kulp
> >> > dkulp@apache.org
> >> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > dkulp@apache.org
> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Mime
View raw message