geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevan Miller <kevan.mil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Impending votes
Date Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:35:48 GMT

On Jun 8, 2009, at 4:06 PM, David Jencks wrote:

>
> On Jun 8, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 8, 2009, at 2:58 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> I've been playing around with genesis to get it releasable and the  
>>> jaspi spec jar.  Jetty needs the latter for their incipient IP  
>>> review so we need to get it out quickly.
>>>
>>> It looks like the site plugin is totally broken.... http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-395

>>>  so I'll beat my head against that wall for only a few more  
>>> minutes before giving up on having maven generated sites for  
>>> multip module projects.  AFAICT the apache-release profile is  
>>> working OK.
>>>
>>> If anyone wants to take a look at this now's the time.  I plan to  
>>> tag and call a vote tomorrow (monday).
>>>
>>> There's one snapshot in genesis I still need to fix, the assembly  
>>> plugin source-release descriptor.
>>
>> David,
>> The NOTICE files being generated for jar files is not up to the  
>> currently-understood-standard for NOTICE files:
>>
>> // ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> // NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4d of The Apache License,
>> // Version 2.0, in this case for Genesis Configuration :: Geronimo  
>> Skin
>> // ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Genesis Configuration :: Geronimo Skin
>> Copyright 2003-2008 Apache Software Foundation
>>
>> In particular, the prolog needs to go... geronimo/genesis/trunk/ 
>> NOTICE looks good (assuming that I'm up to date in my  
>> understanding...). Would be best if all the notices looked like  
>> that, I think...
>>
>> I scanned the source and didn't see any problems...
>
> I'm not sure where that came from.... I'm not building a genesis  
> skin (although I might by the time I release).  The currently  
> generated notices look like this:
>
>
> Java Authentication SPI for Containers
> Copyright 2003-2009 The Apache Software Foundation
>
> This product includes software developed at
> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>
>
> Does that look OK?

Yes, it does. Wonder if I had some old files sitting around. I might  
not have "cleaned" before building... I'll give it a try.

--kevan
Mime
View raw message