Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37170 invoked from network); 19 May 2009 21:46:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 May 2009 21:46:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 80139 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2009 21:46:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 80049 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2009 21:46:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 80041 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2009 21:46:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 May 2009 21:46:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.86.89.66] (HELO elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 May 2009 21:46:39 +0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=LuRMAk1DQO9+bpN2zq7rZAOOn2Hz/2doV9vvE04CKCKXHVo2AIMlrOM9XYjCFZ74; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [129.33.49.251] (helo=tetra.raleigh.ibm.com) by elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1M6X8c-0000g9-9m for dev@geronimo.apache.org; Tue, 19 May 2009 17:46:18 -0400 Message-ID: <4A1328A7.9080609@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:46:15 -0400 From: Joe Bohn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [blueprint] itests failing with NoClassDefFoundError References: <5eb405c70905182149r14591eceyd306e3704d9b7649@mail.gmail.com> <18A507A8-4314-4665-8CBF-39CDEFBE933F@visi.com> In-Reply-To: <18A507A8-4314-4665-8CBF-39CDEFBE933F@visi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: c408501814fc19611aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec795b97330a9cb660cc50790982b9ef74b2350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 129.33.49.251 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hmm ... I've been building with the itests just fine ... and that's even with maven 2.0.9. I did have one problem earlier today but noticed another code change soon after my build failed ... so I updated and built again. However, I haven't attempted to build with a clean repo. I did just notice one problem when I attempted to comment out some of the references in the blueprint-sample and build again - that caused itest failures. Once I reverted my changes things were once again successful. I learned that the blueprint-sample is used in the itests so even changes which I thought would not affect anything actually did have an impact. Joe David Blevins wrote: > Gave 2.0.10 a try. No luck so tried the clean repo, also no luck. > > $ svn up > At revision 776452. > > $ mvn clean install -Dmaven.repo.local=repo > blueprint-build.log > > $ cat blueprint-itests/target/surefire-reports/*.txt > > blueprint-surefire.txt > > And the results: > > http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/blueprint-build.log > http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/blueprint-surefire.txt > > > If you haven't already, give a clean repo a try yourself. Could be > there's local state in your repo that makes things work -- wouldn't be > the first or last time anything like that ever happened. > > > -David > > > On May 18, 2009, at 9:49 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: > >> What version of maven are you using? I had problems with 2.0.9 but >> works fine for me with 2.0.10. I don't know if this will help but >> maybe try with clean m2 repo? itests pull in a lot of stuff... maybe >> we need to tie down some plugin version. >> >> Jarek >> >> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:33 PM, David Blevins >> wrote: >>> Trying to get a clean build on the blueprint code. Getting several >>> errors >>> due to what seems like an invalid bundle config. >>> >>> ERROR: Error starting file:bundles/blueprint-core_1.0.0.SNAPSHOT.jar >>> (org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle 5: >>> package; >>> (&(package=org.osgi.service.blueprint.reflect)(version>=1.0.0))) >>> org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle 5: >>> package; (&(package=org.osgi.service.blueprint.reflect)(version>=1.0.0)) >>> at >>> org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.resolveBundle(Felix.java:3090) >>> at org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.startBundle(Felix.java:1439) >>> at >>> org.apache.felix.framework.Felix.setActiveStartLevel(Felix.java:984) >>> at >>> org.apache.felix.framework.StartLevelImpl.run(StartLevelImpl.java:263) >>> >>> I'm guessing that 1.0.0.SNAPSHOT is considered greater than 1.0.0 and >>> something else is going on. >>> >>> What's the trick to getting these tests to run? >>> >>> -David >>> >>> >> > >