geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ivan <xhh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: A confusion about those names in the EAR deployment
Date Mon, 25 May 2009 12:53:01 GMT
Thanks, David.
Not yet. I think it is caused by the moduleName created by the
ModuleBuilder. For while adding sub gbeans, moduleName is always used to
create the abstractName.
I will try jetty later.
Ivan

2009/5/25 David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>

> That seems like a bug to me... it's probably a small code change to fix if
> you can figure out where :-)  Does jetty do the same thing?
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On May 25, 2009, at 5:17 AM, Ivan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>    I have some confusion about those artifact ids while deploying an EAR
> package.
>    While deploying an EAR package, the deployer will create a
> ConfigurationData gbean for the EAR and all the WARs under the EAR. The
> problem is those Configuations represent those WAR pacakges in the EAR.
>    Those gbeans do not have the same artifact with the Configuration
> contains them. They have the same artifact id with the EAR Configuration.
>    Let's take the console-tomcat for an example.
>    The artifactId for the *console-tomcat* (EAR) is *
> org.apache.geronimo.plugins/console-tomcat/2.2-SNAPSHOT/car*
>    The artifactId for the *portal-driver.war* (a WAR  in the EAR) is *
> org.apache.geronimo.plugins/console-tomcat_portal-driver.war/2.2-SNAPSHOT/car
> *
>    But the gbeans contained by the *portal-driver.war*'s abstract name is
> *org.apache.geronimo.plugins/console-tomcat/2.2-SNAPSHOT/car*?J2EEApplication=org.apache.geronimo.plugins/console-tomcat/2.2-SNAPSHOT/car,WebModule=portal-driver.war,j2eeType=GBean,name=CARExportForward
>
>    So is it the correct behavior, I guess that some JIRAs are caused by
> this.
>    Thanks for any comment !
> --
> Ivan
>
>
>


-- 
Ivan

Mime
View raw message