geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [blueprint] Initialization
Date Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:03:21 GMT
The lazy bundle activation policy has not been implemented yet.

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 19:53, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote:
> Referring to this section on Initialization.
>
>  If the instantiation phase is caused by one of the trigger services then it
>  must run synchronously with the getService method invocation that triggered
>  the continuance. This allows the service request to return a service
>  object from the initialized Blueprint Context. All other and subsequent
> service
>  requests on trigger services must block until the instantiation process
>  has completely finished.
>
>  Otherwise, the instantiation process must run asynchronously from the
>  Bundle STARTED event. Race conditions between this event and the trigger
>  services must be properly managed without causing errors.
>
>
>
> -David
>
>
> On Apr 29, 2009, at 9:36 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> Not sure what you're talking about...
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 22:10, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> How much or how little of the triggered initialization guarantees are
>>> implemented so far?  Did some very similar synchronization guarantees for
>>> EJB 3.1 singleton lazy initialization.
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Mime
View raw message