geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guillaume Nodet <>
Subject Re: [OSGi] Support for RFC 124?
Date Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:49:13 GMT
I agree that we need to join forces.
Actually, i have started experimenting with xbean-refect after having
seen your code :-)

If we are going to use generics in the implementation, it may be
easier to use the reflect package implementation classes that i wrote.
Anyway, I think the main difference is that the one Rick wrote allow
deep copy of values with a copy constructor.  Rick, have you seen such
a need anywhere in the spec ?  While implementing the parser, I
haven't seen the need for it so I wonder if we need to keep that or
The parser has dependencies on those classes, so we need to merge /
refactor here.

I'm currently working on integrating your code into mine, but we could
do the opposite if you prefer.

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 22:17, Jarek Gawor <> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Guillaume Nodet <> wrote:
>> Btw, I'm not so sure iPojo is a good candidate for implementing the
>> blueprint service.
>> I've began doing some testing with xbean-reflect and I am able to
>> parse and instanciate very simple beans.
>> See:
>> and the blueprint xml
> Since you're not using iPojo now there is no point of having two
> separate efforts of implementing rfc124. So I think we should merge
> into one project. For example, let's take your parser and integrate
> with my (and Rick's) code and go from there. I already experimented
> with xbean-reflect and I think it might work but will need some extra
> modifications.
> Jarek

Guillaume Nodet
Open Source SOA

View raw message