geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [OSGi] Support for RFC 124?
Date Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:14:04 GMT
I agree.  It may need a bit of fixing in xbean-reflect to cope with
conversions or typed values, but xbean-reflect should be able to
handle most of the graph creation, which is a really good thing.

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 21:05, Rick McGuire <rickmcg@gmail.com> wrote:
> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>
>> Btw, I'm not so sure iPojo is a good candidate for implementing the
>> blueprint service.
>> I've began doing some testing with xbean-reflect and I am able to
>> parse and instanciate very simple beans.
>>
>
> Based on what I've seen so far, it shouldn't be difficult to create Recipes
> that perform all of the different flavors of injection/instantiation that
> the blueprint service requires.
>
> Rick
>
>> See:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/gnodet/blueprint/org.apache.felix.blueprint/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/blueprint/WiringTest.java
>> and the blueprint xml
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/gnodet/blueprint/org.apache.felix.blueprint/src/test/resources/test-wiring.xml
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 16:08, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I think using JDK 5 is good enough.  We just need to make sure we
>>> don't use too much jdk 5 specific features so that we can use
>>> retrotranslator if needed.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 15:12, Rick McGuire <rickmcg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jarek Gawor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Btw, I checked in under
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/gawor/rfc124 a tiny
>>>>> bit of code that I was playing around with to better understand RFC
>>>>> 124. I'll keep on working and experimenting with it but anyone is
>>>>> welcome to join. I'm planning to add some of the RFC 124 API
>>>>> definitions next in order see what it would take to implement these
>>>>> API.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jarek
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Before I go too far in writing new stuff, I think we should clarify the
>>>> JVM
>>>> target for this.  The Blueprint spec outlines a couple of optional
>>>> features
>>>> for for implementations that run on Java5 and above that use generics.
>>>>  The
>>>> bulk of the features will run fine on a 1.4.2 JVM version.  Are we
>>>> agreed
>>>> that the target for this is a full implementation (which will require a
>>>> Java
>>>> 5 JVM to execute)?  The answer to this determines whether generics can
>>>> be
>>>> used in the internal code as well.
>>>>
>>>> Rick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com

Mime
View raw message