geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick McGuire <rick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [OSGi] Support for RFC 124?
Date Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:05:01 GMT
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Btw, I'm not so sure iPojo is a good candidate for implementing the
> blueprint service.
> I've began doing some testing with xbean-reflect and I am able to
> parse and instanciate very simple beans.
>   
Based on what I've seen so far, it shouldn't be difficult to create 
Recipes that perform all of the different flavors of 
injection/instantiation that the blueprint service requires.

Rick

> See:
>    https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/gnodet/blueprint/org.apache.felix.blueprint/src/test/java/org/apache/felix/blueprint/WiringTest.java
> and the blueprint xml
>    https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/gnodet/blueprint/org.apache.felix.blueprint/src/test/resources/test-wiring.xml
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 16:08, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> I think using JDK 5 is good enough.  We just need to make sure we
>> don't use too much jdk 5 specific features so that we can use
>> retrotranslator if needed.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 15:12, Rick McGuire <rickmcg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>     
>>> Jarek Gawor wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Btw, I checked in under
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/gawor/rfc124 a tiny
>>>> bit of code that I was playing around with to better understand RFC
>>>> 124. I'll keep on working and experimenting with it but anyone is
>>>> welcome to join. I'm planning to add some of the RFC 124 API
>>>> definitions next in order see what it would take to implement these
>>>> API.
>>>>
>>>> Jarek
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Before I go too far in writing new stuff, I think we should clarify the JVM
>>> target for this.  The Blueprint spec outlines a couple of optional features
>>> for for implementations that run on Java5 and above that use generics.  The
>>> bulk of the features will run fine on a 1.4.2 JVM version.  Are we agreed
>>> that the target for this is a full implementation (which will require a Java
>>> 5 JVM to execute)?  The answer to this determines whether generics can be
>>> used in the internal code as well.
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>
>>>       
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   


Mime
View raw message