geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jarek Gawor <jga...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: should we update schema namespace for backwards compatible changes?
Date Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:04:24 GMT
We've had similar conversations before and I think we pretty much
decided that backwards compatible changes without updating the
namespace were ok.

(Although, from my understanding the recommended practice is to change
the namespace each time a change is made)

Jarek

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:28 AM, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Following a user request here at apachecon eu I finally implemented the
> ability to override env-entry elements in geronimo plans (GERONIMO-3954)
> (also, I'm not sure if this works for ejbs -- is openejb using our env-entry
> builder?)
>
> This requires a backwards compatible change to the geronimo naming schema.
>
> In the past we've tended to update the schema namespace by increasing the
> version with every change although this has resulted in a lot of nuisance
> and does not appear to be a recommended practice.
>
> So far I haven't updated the namespace. I'm very tempted to suggest that we
> change our policy a bit and not change the namespace so often.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>

Mime
View raw message