Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 29793 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2009 18:18:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2009 18:18:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 27039 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2009 18:18:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 26993 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2009 18:18:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 98754 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2009 18:03:38 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of techhusky@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.241 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+V6FqQo+soJPhL/kHux942VcNrv1k7YCWyUHfePzG/w=; b=JsJ8VAKdGABec6dR5yNzR97pYkHMYpNGx9agp2O8leiy4BEfqFlGYbWArxCZXo40/5 rp9WPoTuvMgB/T1o+NO2kO3OsA6Ffxnk5emd32f3tMlf3QVqY6tVL3Ru3646Ppr4NqCJ lGCZFvdAR5IJP6RKjuY86ayrZv96HwRThsSB8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=JbayNpd4Qm67ZzdZPtW6l3BiP7so2TUi+MjNSPV9nGMMMGD7scbho7yw7pX4S6cWr8 7NYukaEJnnxmVP0lSGQgL569H8FdGhiwbVHE/RFITnnmdoFyS2nD7XsSIDfDlCpk6aTk svDsE1QYwrc17g5s78yejimQhAVI3HezfQB5M= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <89c0c52c0902031355x476da14bw8e77ff8f5053745c@mail.gmail.com> References: <89c0c52c0902031355x476da14bw8e77ff8f5053745c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:03:09 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Access to Bean Validation provider (JSR-303) From: Jeremy Bauer To: dev@openjpa.apache.org, dev@geronimo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e640c6aab5f18604621b998b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e640c6aab5f18604621b998b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Kevin, I did some searching and ran across agimatic-validation[1] by agimatic GmbH, a JSR-303 implementation in the works. It is published under the Apache 2.0 License. The Hibernate JSR-303 spec jar is currently listed as dependency, but using it with a Geronimo equivalent may be an option. -Jeremy [1] http://code.google.com/p/agimatec-validation/ On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote: > Hi, > The JPA 2.0 expert group is looking to incorporate Bean Validation > (JSR-303). Right now, it looks like we might include it as an optional > feature. If a Bean Validation provider is available, then the JPA provider > should use it. Otherwise, it is not a requirement. > > The RI is being developed by Redhat. There was an Apache Commons sandbox > started for a potential Bean Validator provider, but the activity has died > off. > > So, I'm wondering from an OpenJPA and OpenEJB perspective, what should we > do? I may be mistaken, but my guess is that the EJB spec is going to > contain a similar dependency on Bean Validation. I don't believe the RI > will be directly accessible to us via a Maven dependency. Does anybody > know > of other Bean Validation provider implementations that are in plan? > > Thoughts, suggestions? > > Kevin > --0016e640c6aab5f18604621b998b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kevin,

I did some searching and ran across agimatic-validation[1] by= agimatic GmbH, a JSR-303 implementation in the works.  It is publishe= d under the Apache 2.0 License.  The Hibernate JSR-303 spec jar is cur= rently listed as dependency, but using it with a Geronimo equivalent may be= an option.

-Jeremy

[1] http://code.google.com/p/agimatec-validation/

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Kevin Sutter <kwsutter@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
The JPA 2.0 expert group is looking to incorporate Bean Validation
(JSR-303).  Right now, it looks like we might include it as an optiona= l
feature.  If a Bean Validation provider is available, then the JPA pro= vider
should use it.  Otherwise, it is not a requirement.

The RI is being developed by Redhat.  There was an Apache Commons sand= box
started for a potential Bean Validator provider, but the activity has died<= br> off.

So, I'm wondering from an OpenJPA and OpenEJB perspective, what should = we
do?  I may be mistaken, but my guess is that the EJB spec is going to<= br> contain a similar dependency on Bean Validation.  I don't believe = the RI
will be directly accessible to us via a Maven dependency.  Does anybod= y know
of other Bean Validation provider implementations that are in plan?

Thoughts, suggestions?

Kevin

--0016e640c6aab5f18604621b998b--