Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87266 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2009 18:43:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Feb 2009 18:43:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 41019 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2009 18:43:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 40968 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2009 18:43:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 40959 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2009 18:43:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:43:01 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [76.13.13.46] (HELO smtp107.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com) (76.13.13.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:42:53 +0000 Received: (qmail 77020 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2009 18:27:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Macintosh.local) (dwoods@75.177.173.152 with plain) by smtp107.prem.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Feb 2009 18:27:47 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: FCFJGgcVM1lbnyqBB8AYNEVThBpFFKGqUUnmx9wsmwBjHSCqMBk08PIrDROxrtpXylIYkoFNBoxgIKSjRK48PIMkyQKbNmAJS_81XZRVkj2Qr5OQRIJftMZXCLuT2oNB9G4bjVL04wKccaW2JYfLqz2jK9.cHKaQ40.YHyU9FzZ3dAgMrL06BrlzDKU- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <49888CA3.5030801@apache.org> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:27:47 -0500 From: Donald Woods User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jcp-open@apache.org CC: dev@openjpa.apache.org, dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec first early access release References: <2A01DAAE-57E9-4B41-9665-296664D6FAEE@yahoo.com> <49837883.9090508@apache.org> <6F37485F-5B71-4318-974D-309294978F33@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <6F37485F-5B71-4318-974D-309294978F33@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Geir, any updates on getting item (iii) below removed, so we can release the early spec implementation and a OpenJPA 2.0.0 M1 release? -Donald David Jencks wrote: > > On Jan 30, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > >> Any updates on item (iii)? Can we just include the notice for EA-1 >> and revisit for the next release? > > My interpretation of Geir's response is that we can't distribute stuff > with this restriction, so no, we have to wait until the conditions are > changed at which point the existing jar under vote will be OK. > > thanks > david jencks > >> >> >> >> -Donald >> >> >> David Jencks wrote: >>> Looks like a problem. >>> I sent a note to legal-discuss about (iii). >>> I'll work on setting up a new release candidate. >>> thanks >>> david jencks >>> On Jan 29, 2009, at 7:46 AM, Jeremy Bauer wrote: >>>> David, >>>> >>>> While searching the JSR-317 draft for direction regarding early >>>> access naming, I found that the notice (page 2) includes the clauses >>>> below, notably item iii. Does clause iii need to be added to the >>>> NOTICE in the EA jar? Also, should the Geronimo EA NOTICE use "JPA >>>> 2.0 EARLY ACCESS" instead of simply "JPA 2.0" in order to meet >>>> clause ii? >>>> >>>> NOTICE >>>> ... >>>> 2.Distribute implementations of the Specification to third parties >>>> for their testing and evaluation use, provided that any such >>>> implementation: >>>> (i) does not modify, subset, superset or otherwise extend the >>>> Licensor Name Space, or include any public or protected packages, >>>> classes, Java interfaces, fields or methods within the Licensor Name >>>> Space other than those required/authorized by the Specification or >>>> Specifications being implemented; >>>> (ii)is clearly and prominently marked with the word "UNTESTED" or >>>> "EARLY ACCESS" or "INCOMPATIBLE" >>>> or "UNSTABLE" or "BETA" in any list of available builds and in >>>> proximity to every link initiating its download, where the list or >>>> link is under Licensee's control; and >>>> (iii)includes the following notice: >>>> "This is an implementation of an early-draft specification developed >>>> under the Java Community Process (JCP) and is made available for >>>> testing and evaluation purposes only. The code is not compatible >>>> with any specification of the JCP." >>>> >>>> >>>> -Jeremy >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:25 PM, David Jencks >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> I've been working with the OpenJPA project to develop the jpa 2.0 >>>> spec jar in our spec repository. They are ready for their first >>>> early access milestone release. >>>> >>>> I've staged the release here: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec/1.0-EA-1/ >>>> >>>> >>>> The svn location is here: >>>> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-EA-1 >>>> >>>> >>>> I haven't staged the site. I don't think its necessary for a >>>> early access release, but will reconsider on request. >>>> >>>> I ran rat on the project, and the autochecking thinks the legal >>>> files are ok. >>>> >>>> >>>> Vote open for 72 hours. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 >>>> [ ] +0 >>>> [ ] -1 >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> david jencks >>>> >>>> > >