geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <>
Subject Re: Make "framework" build the entire framework server
Date Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:16:18 GMT
I did the basic reorganization in rev 746112.  We probably want to  
change some groupIds if everyone is OK with the change.

On Feb 18, 2009, at 4:46 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:

> On Feb 18, 2009, at 7:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>> On Feb 17, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>> Sounds worth the time to try it out.
>>> Two requests:
>>> 1) If this works, we publish the framework assembly instead of the  
>>> two minimal assemblies to the Download page for 2.2, as this would  
>>> allow users to build their own custom minimal server assembly (and  
>>> of course some docs telling users how to create the old minimal  
>>> assembly from this new framework assembly.)
>> I'm neutral or slightly +0.1 on this idea.  I don't actually see  
>> how it relates to my proposal but if everyone agrees I'm fine with  
>> this idea.
> Less = more IMO, so I'm +1

I guess this should be a separate vote...
>>> 2) If time permits, can we move or duplicate relevant testsuite  
>>> modules into a new testsuite dir under either the framework dir or  
>>> a new framework-testsuite dir, so that we can verify the basic  
>>> framework cmdline scripts and installing plugins (like Jetty/ 
>>> Tomcat to make an equivalent minimal assembly)?
>> I like this idea.  For a few months now when I work on a plugin set  
>> (mconsole, activemq) I've included a custom server aseembly in the  
>> plugin group and added at least one integration test.  This has  
>> really helped speed up feature development.  IIUC you are proposing  
>> doing the same for framework.
> Sure, +1
I haven't done this yet.  I don't think we have any integration tests  
that run on framework yet.  I'll probably come up with some simple  
ones soon.

david jencks

> --jason

View raw message