geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevan Miller <kevan.mil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.0.3 release
Date Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:59:34 GMT

On Feb 17, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:

>
> On Feb 16, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I did some work on trying to get a 2.0.3 release that would:
>> a) build - sucess!
>> b) pass the TCK - Massive failure (over 5000 tests)
>>
>> So, considering that we have a 2.1.x and 2.2.x codestream in progress
>> with JEE6 breathing down our necks - I have been officially pushed  
>> into
>> the 'we should probably just document what it takes to upgrade'  
>> group.
>>
>> Are there any folks who truly need to stay on 2.0?
>>
>> Or would it be reasonable to make a pronouncement that the 2.0.x
>> codestream is no longer going to be maintained - even for bug fixes  
>> and
>> security issues?
>>
>> Thoughts/comments?
>>
>> (I'll start documenting the libraries/jars that have changed or been
>> removed - we will need that regardless)
>
>
> There should be discussion of this on our user list. Could you start  
> a discussion there?
>
> I'm ok with this. Confess that I'm a bit curious about why we'd have  
> tck failures. I don't have a big issue with it, but in general we  
> don't discuss tck specifics (including numbers of tests, etc) on a  
> public list.

Jay,
FYI, I checked back on our automated test results. February 4th is  
when we started seeing test failures on branches/2.0. So the following  
commits are the likely causes of the problems:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=740608
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=740985

--kevan

Mime
View raw message