geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jack Cai <greensi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Time for Geronimo 2.1.4 release?
Date Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:33:22 GMT
We have done some test here with the tranql SQLServer 2000 and 2005 XA
connector (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4279), and TranQL
Informix XA connector (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4365),
both look good. So they should be ready to get into Geronimo 2.1.4.

Still trying with the TranQL connector for Oracle RAC - not easy to set up
the environment...

-Jack

2009/2/6 Jarek Gawor <jgawor@gmail.com>

> Jay,
>
> Updating OpenEJB 3.0.1 to xbean 3.5 will require 2.0.3 and 2.1.4 to
> update the asm 3.1 library (and that will need even more changes). I
> know some other libs have deps on the asm lib so we might run into
> problems later on.
>
> How about we only upgrade xbean-naming to 3.5 first and leave other
> xbean dependencies on 3.4.1? If that doesn't work we can try 3.5 for
> everything.
>
> Jarek
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Jay D. McHugh <jaydmchugh@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > All of the 2.0.3 build issues are fixed.
> >
> > I will try building 2.0.3 with XBeans 3.5 now and let you all know what
> > happens.
> >
> > If it will build, then I might take a look to see whether I can figure
> > out what changes are necessary for OpenEJB 3.0.1 to use XBeans 3.5 too.
> >
> > Jay
> >
> > Jay D. McHugh wrote:
> >> The problem is with the version of ASM that is brought in when using a
> >> higher version of XBeans.
> >>
> >> OpenEJB is using a method that has been removed:
> >> org.objectweb.asm.ClassReader.accept
> >>
> >> And Geronimo (already - not counting XBeans 3.5) is using classes that
> >> have been removed:
> >> LinkResolver
> >> UniqueDefaultLinkResolver
> >>
> >> Jay
> >>
> >> Joe Bohn wrote:
> >>> Thanks for the info Jay and for doing some more digging.
> >>>
> >>> I don't really have a strong desire to push everything to xBean 3.5.  I
> >>> was just trying to eliminate the use of multiple xBean versions as this
> >>> could potentially cause problems (and confusion) for our users.
> >>>
> >>> It looks like we originally moved up to xBean 3.5 (actually
> >>> 3.5-SNAPSHOT) to resolve a jca context issue (Geronimo-4375).  However,
> >>> it looks like it was soon discovered that there were issues with the
> >>> OpenEJB, ASM and xBean versions in G.  As a result ... we ended up
> >>> reverting back to an older ASM and xBean 3.3 for finder and reflect
> >>> while keeping the newer xbean-naming 3.5 so that the original issue was
> >>> still resolved.  That seems to be working and is perhaps the best
> >>> approach.  I was just concerned about using the various xBean versions
> >>> in our Geronimo 2.1.4 server.  Perhaps using the various xBean versions
> >>> is still the best thing to do here.  I didn't realize that there were
> >>> core issues in OpenEJB attempting to use anything greater than 3.4.1.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Joe
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Jay D. McHugh wrote:
> >>>> Hey everyone,
> >>>>
> >>>> If we want to get OpenEJB 3.0.1 to move up to XBeans 3.5, then I think
> >>>> that we'll need to chip in to resolve the problems that pop up when
> you
> >>>> use a version greater than 3.4.1.
> >>>>
> >>>> That was the highest version (available at the time) that could be
> used
> >>>> in the OpenEJB 3.0 branch without causing errors.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'll try switching to XBeans 3.5 (after the build I am in the middle
> of
> >>>> finishes) and let you all know if it goes through cleanly.
> >>>>
> >>>> My feeling is that it won't though.
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, I have been trying to get a 'final' Geronimo 2.0.x release put
> >>>> together and will need OpenEJB 3.0.1 for that (3.0 no longer builds
> >>>> because the artifacts for XBeans changed groupIds).
> >>>>
> >>>> Jay
> >>>>
> >>>> Joe Bohn wrote:
> >>>>> I was relaying the information second-hand ... so it's very possible
> I
> >>>>> got it wrong.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It looks like there is a dependency xBean in OpenEJB ... but it's
> 3.4.1
> >>>>> rather than 3.3 (as we have in the branches/2.1).  So, perhaps if
we
> can
> >>>>> convince OpenEJB 3.0.x to xBean 3.5 we can then make the references
> >>>>> consistent in our 2.1 branch.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Joe
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Donald Woods wrote:
> >>>>>> I don't see any dependencies on Xbean in OpenJPA 1.0.x or 1.2.x.
> >>>>>> Maybe you're thinking about OpenEJB?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Donald
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Joe Bohn wrote:
> >>>>>>> I agree we should get a 2.1.4 release out ... and you certainly
> have
> >>>>>>> my vote for release manager!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The only thing I would add to the list is to get our xBean
> references
> >>>>>>> to a consistent versions.  I noticed this as I was updating
> >>>>>>> branches/2.1 and trunk to pull in the newly released xBean
3.5.  In
> >>>>>>> branches/2.1 we have a mix of 3.3 dependencies (finder and
reflect)
> >>>>>>> and 3.5 dependencies (naming).  I've been told that this
was due to
> >>>>>>> OpenJPA dependencies on 3.3.  Now that we are pulling in
a new
> >>>>>>> OpenJPA release we will hopefully be able to update everything
to
> use
> >>>>>>> xBean 3.5.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Joe
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jarek Gawor wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I think it's time for Geronimo 2.1.4 release. We've
had a lot of
> >>>>>>>> important fixes since 2.1.3 and we should get them out
to our
> users.
> >>>>>>>> And if we agree, I would also like to volunteer to be
a release
> >>>>>>>> manager for this release.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Looking at the current status for 2.1.4 there are still
a few
> things
> >>>>>>>> that we need to do before we can go ahead with the release.
I
> updated
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.4+Release+Status
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> page with some of these items. If there are any open
bugs that
> _need_
> >>>>>>>> to be fixed for 2.1.4 or if I missed anything in that
list please
> >>>>>>>> just
> >>>>>>>> update that wiki page.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>> Jarek
> >>>>>>>>
> >
>

Mime
View raw message