geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec first early access release
Date Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:40:24 GMT
Any replies from Sun on this?


-Donald


Donald Woods wrote:
> Geir, any updates on getting item (iii) below removed, so we can release 
> the early spec implementation and a OpenJPA 2.0.0 M1 release?
> 
> 
> -Donald
> 
> 
> David Jencks wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>
>>> Any updates on item (iii)?  Can we just include the notice for EA-1 
>>> and revisit for the next release?
>>
>> My interpretation of Geir's response is that we can't distribute stuff 
>> with this restriction, so no, we have to wait until the conditions are 
>> changed at which point the existing jar under vote will be OK.
>>
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Donald
>>>
>>>
>>> David Jencks wrote:
>>>> Looks like a problem.
>>>> I sent a note to legal-discuss about (iii).
>>>> I'll work on setting up a new release candidate.
>>>> thanks
>>>> david jencks
>>>> On Jan 29, 2009, at 7:46 AM, Jeremy Bauer wrote:
>>>>> David,
>>>>>
>>>>> While searching the JSR-317 draft for direction regarding early 
>>>>> access naming, I found that the notice (page 2) includes the 
>>>>> clauses below, notably item iii.  Does clause iii need to be added 
>>>>> to the NOTICE in the EA jar?  Also, should the Geronimo EA NOTICE 
>>>>> use "JPA 2.0 EARLY ACCESS" instead of simply "JPA 2.0" in order to 
>>>>> meet clause ii?
>>>>> <jsr-317 draft>
>>>>> NOTICE
>>>>> ...
>>>>> 2.Distribute implementations of the Specification to third parties 
>>>>> for their testing and evaluation use, provided that any such 
>>>>> implementation:
>>>>> (i) does not modify, subset, superset or otherwise extend the 
>>>>> Licensor Name Space, or include any public or protected packages, 
>>>>> classes, Java interfaces, fields or methods within the Licensor 
>>>>> Name Space other than those required/authorized by the 
>>>>> Specification or Specifications being implemented;
>>>>> (ii)is clearly and prominently marked with the word "UNTESTED" or 
>>>>> "EARLY ACCESS" or "INCOMPATIBLE"
>>>>> or "UNSTABLE" or "BETA" in any list of available builds and in 
>>>>> proximity to every link initiating its download, where the list or 
>>>>> link is under Licensee's control; and
>>>>> (iii)includes the following notice:
>>>>> "This is an implementation of an early-draft specification 
>>>>> developed under the Java Community Process (JCP) and is made 
>>>>> available for testing and evaluation purposes only. The code is not 
>>>>> compatible with any specification of the JCP."
>>>>> </jsr-317 draft>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Jeremy
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:25 PM, David Jencks 
>>>>> <david_jencks@yahoo.com <mailto:david_jencks@yahoo.com>>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>    I've been working with the OpenJPA project to develop the jpa 2.0
>>>>>    spec jar in our spec repository.  They are ready for their first
>>>>>    early access milestone release.
>>>>>
>>>>>    I've staged the release here:
>>>>>
>>>>>    
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec/1.0-EA-1/

>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    The svn location is here:
>>>>>    
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0-EA-1

>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    I haven't staged the site.  I don't think its necessary for a
>>>>>    early access release, but will reconsider on request.
>>>>>
>>>>>    I ran rat on the project, and the autochecking thinks the legal
>>>>>    files are ok.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    Vote open for 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>>    [ ] +1
>>>>>    [ ] +0
>>>>>    [ ] -1
>>>>>
>>>>>    thanks
>>>>>    david jencks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
> 

Mime
View raw message