Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Message-ID: <640629796.1229110784269.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:39:44 -0800 (PST)
From: "David Jencks (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4465) FOP and Geronimo
In-Reply-To: <1793559591.1229088104219.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656126#action_12656126 ] 

David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4465:
----------------------------------------

I don't think that geronimo includes any fop classes at all, so I'm mystified by your results.

Could you modify your code to include something like this...

System.out.println(org.apache.fop.SomeFopClass.class.getClassLoader().toString());

(using an actual fop class) and tell us what it reports with and without the filter?

> FOP and Geronimo
> ----------------
>
>                 Key: GERONIMO-4465
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4465
>             Project: Geronimo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.1
>            Reporter: Jean-Jacques Parent
>            Priority: Minor
>
> More a question than a bug...
> I used to use the fop-0.20.5.jar to generate pdf file with another web server (weblogic). this generation was based on xls template produced by the scriptura 
> designer tool.
> After migrating from Weblogic to Geronimo, this generation used to still working fine.
> I produce now a xsl template with xslfast tool. This time my pdf result is nearly blank.
> After some investigations, I finally put a filter in the geronimo-application.xml as follow : <filter>org.apache.fop</filter>
> And It works fine now.
> So since I am using Geronimo, I supppose that my fop-0.20.5.jar was no longer used, and that a Geronimo specific fop was use instead.
> (Just tel me if I am wrong.)
> Could you please tell me which jar in the geronimo repository is in charge to do FOP processing, and which version of FOP is used?
> Should I use the InverseLoading = true for other jar I have in common with Geronimo ?
> Thanks in advance

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.