Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jgawor@gmail.com designates
 74.125.44.29 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
         :references;
        b=m9l8yRUggmF6L8eNyjykHS7J/xmy/BRLHqL/fskvLgRo0flI6C+oGCJBk93ORJ9wRF
         R96GJJ5rnxpiTcojpeAQv6YxKAeM7HMlzc+JHRvJWkWDCj9XkpgJjaXnZIyN4FvTTHjt
         +5gzR6qXFrLeUHVhmpfjtojOGQsbSj5MUkiYA=
Message-ID: <5eb405c70812031304p51bd3dcejec5785261d5b3611@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 16:04:26 -0500
From: "Jarek Gawor" <jgawor@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: servlet 3.0 spec in 2.2
In-Reply-To: <4936E829.4060907@earthlink.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4936E829.4060907@earthlink.net>

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Joe Bohn <joe.bohn@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Things looks strange regarding the servlet spec references in 2.2.
>
> We include dependency management entries for both 3.0 & 2.5.  That much is
> fine.
>
> Nearly everything that references the servlet spec includes the 2.5 version
> with the exception of the following:
> - jee-specs - This is the most confusing to me.  I was expecting that either
> 2.5 would be included or both 2.5 & 3.0 (if that is even possible).  Why
> 3.0?
> - jaxws-tests/jaxws-rest-war - Jarek indicated that this might just have
> been a bad cut/paste and it should be fine with the 2.5 spec.
> - jaxws-wsa-tests/wsa-test-war - same as above.
>
> So, the question is ... Should we move jee-specs to use the 2.5 spec and
>  then remove the references to the servlet_3.0 spec until after the 2.2
> server is released?

Yes. I don't think we will pass Java EE 5 TCK otherwise. Or we can do
the trick like we do for the connector spec.

Jarek