Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <493ED5C3.5050903@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:32:03 -0500
From: Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: 2.2 (trunk) bucket-o-snapshots
References: <491A0F62.3020805@earthlink.net> <493EC46F.8060407@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <493EC46F.8060407@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Removed duplicate xpp3/xpp3 depend and only include xpp3/xpp3_min now as 
of Rev724871.


-Donald

Donald Woods wrote:
> We also have multiple versions of some depends getting pulled into the 
> assemblies right now, that needs to get fixed:
> 
> commons-logging - 1.0.3 and 1.0.4
> xpp3 and xpp3_min
> org.apache.ws.commons.schema.XmlSchema - 1.4.2 and SNAPSHOT
> 
> 
> Some new/questionable depends:
> com.envoisolutions.sxc.sxc-jaxb and sxc-runtime
> org.jvnet.staxex
> quartz.quartz
> 
> And backport-util-concurrent is still in the distro...
> 
> Also, can we remove com/sun/xml/ws/jaxws-rt and jaxws-tools, now that we 
> are using CXF for wsgen?
> 
> 
> -Donald
> 
> 
> Joe Bohn wrote:
>> It has been mentioned several times that we should be looking to 
>> release Geronimo 2.2 before the end of the year (preferrably 
>> mid-December).
>>
>>
>> Before we can consider a release there are a large number of snapshots 
>> that need to be removed/replaced in our project.  Can anybody shed any 
>> light on these (or others that I may have missed)?
>>
>>
>> OpenEJB 3.1-SNAPSHOT  - Actually, OpenEJB 3.1 was released in late 
>> October.  However, the trunk version was never updated and some 
>> additional changes have been included.  Recent changes in Geronimo 
>> trunk now require this snapshot that is actually newer than the 3.1 
>> release. IMO we should revert the trunk change and attempt to work 
>> with the released OpenEJB 3.1.
>>
>> Axis2 SNAPSHOT (yep, it's just SNAPSHOT without a number).  IIUC 
>> correctly we need to get an Axis2 release before we can consider a 
>> Geronimo 2.2 release.  Does anybody know how close we are to getting 
>> an Axis2 release?
>>
>> Axiom SNAPSHOT (yep. it's just SNAPSHOT too).  I believe this is 
>> required by Axis2 ... so if Axis2 is released then they will have to 
>> get Axiom released as well (and we can pick up the released version).
>>
>> -xBean 3.5-SNAPSHOT.  Is this snapshot really required (I presume it 
>> must be)?  In branches/2.1 we're still using 3.3.  It looks like the 
>> latest released version is 3.4.3.  I'll give that a shot if I don't 
>> hear from anybody that we really need 3.5.
>>
>> -wadi 2.1-SNAPSHOT.  Is this snapshot really required (I presume it 
>> must be)?  In branches/2.1 we're using 2.0.  What function requires 
>> 2.1-SNAPSHOT and is can somebody directly involved with wadi provide 
>> an estimate on when this might be released?
>>
>> -geronimo_j2ee-connector_1.6_spec 1.0-EA-SNAPSHOT.  Are we at a point 
>> where we can release this spec or do we need to wait until we verify tck?
>>
>> - geronimo-jaspi_1.0_spec 1.0-SNAPSHOT.  Are we at a point where we 
>> can release this spec or do we need to wait until we verify tck?
>>
>> - geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec 1.0-EA-SNAPSHOT.  Are we at a point where 
>> we can release this spec or do we need to wait until we verify tck?
>>
>> - geronimo-jaspi 1.0-SNAPSHOT.  This is a new geronimo component.  How 
>> close is this to being able to be released?
>>
>> - geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec 1.0-SNAPSHOT.  How close is this to 
>> being able to be released?
>>
>> - XmlSchema SNAPSHOT (yep, it's just SNAPSHOT).  I believe this is 
>> also related to Axis2 dependencies and will have to be resolved by 
>> Axis2 as they release.
>>
>> - woden* 1.0-SNAPSHOT.  This is also related to Axis2 and will have to 
>> be resolved for an Axis2 release so we will pull in whatever they 
>> require.
>>
>> - selenium-maven-plugin 1.0-rc-1-SNAPSHOT.  I believe that we pulled 
>> this in trying to resolve the FF3 issues.  It's not clear to me if we 
>> would have to remove this SNAPSHOT prior to a release but I think it 
>> would be best to ensure that the tagged release can always be built 
>> and run with tests - therefore I think we should remove it.  Any other 
>> opinions?
>>
>> - jspc-maven-plugin 2.0-alpha-2-SNAPSHOT.  I'm not sure why this is 
>> updated (in branches/2.1 we use 2.0-alpha-1-20070806).  Anybody know? 
>> We should remove it.
>>
>> - jspc-compiler-tomcat6 2.0-alpha-2-SNAPSHOT.  I'm not sure why this 
>> was updated either.  In branches/2.1 we updated the maven plugin 
>> (above) but not the compiler but in trunk both were updated to the 
>> alpha-2-SNAPSHOT.  Anybody know why?
>>
>> - ianal-maven-plugin  1.0-alpha-1-SNAPSHOT.  No doubt to support the 
>> new legal file processing.  Is there a released version we can use 
>> instead of the SNAPSHOT or do we need to get a release here are well?
>>
>>
>> Joe
>>
>