Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53626 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2008 04:45:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2008 04:45:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 15673 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2008 04:45:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 15197 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2008 04:45:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 15186 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2008 04:45:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:45:30 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.12 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.12] (HELO mail-gx0-f12.google.com) (209.85.217.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:44:05 +0000 Received: by gxk5 with SMTP id 5so630783gxk.19 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:43:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=M4oobrd5jekGERmRbTE9pc40k2k0S9oE/vAOuklnDF8=; b=MEIdDhlWv+dHhhTbPuH1xSTN9B8xeH4Wz/B3jb8XC7Btodr3Kuv7WeQCS6QOW6ZM6g NgL3ZEjKuGUjL/lP8e0Zt1gL5q4Cmks/a/6TPuL/UqTcZOosWFNpssZ9BXPiwU8QUUdg I9FdiGWcBSAmqg25TH5GwlpIoiGQIuQu8UwHk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=hRWHEf2xC2nVtidQU3H18JbW+zv/oTXEEqJ/7xSyCjm5AxbScN0WUHsh4tH9309ZFv t+p4QaQf+QSBcD4QpyJ3GZqbD4FfZSto29eENhSmTKtGkZRJ/AHVKM0ZD2wAPTYsFAkS evQRP0gkkgTRtuBQn5MBtLPx3lvatCGzLIKOA= Received: by 10.150.186.21 with SMTP id j21mr6324428ybf.91.1227501830572; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:43:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.1.191? (cpe-076-182-095-055.nc.res.rr.com [76.182.95.55]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j13sm6690253rne.4.2008.11.23.20.43.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:43:49 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <8BE2A56D-964C-4D20-A9CC-4D73AD7FA30E@gmail.com> From: Kevan Miller To: dev@geronimo.apache.org In-Reply-To: <49245683.4060605@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] What will trunk become after we create the 2.2 branch? Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:43:48 -0500 References: <49245683.4060605@apache.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Nov 19, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > Current thinking is that we'll create branches/2.2 from trunk around > Dec. 12, so we can start closing down the 2.2 release. > > What is everyone's thoughts on what version we'll use for trunk when > that happens? > 1) trunk becomes 3.0-SNAPSHOT and focused on JEE6 > 2) trunk becomes 2.3-SNAPSHOT, will include some JEE6 technology > preview, but is still focused on being another JEE5 release in 2009 IMO, we should feel free to break Java EE 5 compliance, post G 2.2. So, I think 3.0-SNAPSHOT will be appropriate. I expect that we'll go through some number of Milestone releases, on our way to EE 6 compliance. It's possible that we could release a 3.0 that is web profile compliant, but not fully EE 6 compliant. IMO, that's something we'll evaluate down-the-line (e.g. once we have an actual initial EE 6 spec to evaluate). --kevan