Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18607 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2008 07:24:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2008 07:24:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 97533 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2008 07:24:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 97468 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2008 07:24:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 97435 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2008 07:24:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:24:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gnodet@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.169] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:22:51 +0000 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id k40so1569948ugc.27 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:23:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=HEu/GOMaF69DviZflgDeStV1fWEUS/R+2VsTjruJq9k=; b=fpvkQI6q7RxgBfLCA5WX2Y3kJZTv+QKn4Zzs3VH6m+u1RCSHsG8SvI1TXDFqxkhndc ssFDAIE94f8iOe26X5WIVCr8nHBu4v9x97suvvy6lp+Meo0fYs8O2Qz6oYBbUyJ5OuD7 DrQqSp99FJfvbtRBghY7w7eoa3IGfrK6nGfIY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=AhpjjlBvRu4GqdgDqiJr3ZtOUiQC7QAquvjC53/mf9Ym1KmBinqkEyz+dmYWh7m8Hu vXC75pQOr0xXAdJ/ibXRUQfUn+a5/JzsIDNM3b8QOe9N/UTGgigCZ1w7e+DK+PjRim9V ELeyO//LZnyk6kzcqZrajPqu4wl6oWB0tu6Jk= Received: by 10.103.245.18 with SMTP id x18mr1195447mur.20.1224141797955; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:23:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.244.13 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:23:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:23:17 +0200 From: "Guillaume Nodet" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: [GSHELL] Timeframe ? Cc: dev@servicemix.apache.org, "Jason Dillon" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday. However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use an old and unreleased version of gshell, but I'd like to avoid such issue and having to rewrite this integration once more. Jason, what's your feeling about gshell's stability (in terms of APIs) and a possible ETA for a new release (be it alpha-2 or whatever) ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com