Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27868 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2008 19:16:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2008 19:16:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 58597 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2008 19:16:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 58294 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2008 19:16:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 58283 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2008 19:16:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:16:52 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of linsun.unc@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.21 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.21] (HELO mail-gx0-f21.google.com) (209.85.217.21) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:15:49 +0000 Received: by gxk14 with SMTP id 14so6943105gxk.19 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:15:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=gQyyX87TJkfVUo8m9s8Cly8ma/nxZ3KRhPO9KtIrkzU=; b=vLLW/rTRzANrpZK/7moecwwMSSlpX80F3JwrzTghrq3aoCSR4FrZg8WUccCMxZbdwG dw5dJULYYm1KLfRbS6td4fXimuHqAl1Azjs31TOFJkDMgNi2cwUoFohhFshPaimCIJka OlNfZOnY89FZAFTWBcJs0IA/j3j+tMdOlJVIQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=UxVj7JoBfq7TBgdCKfjJiq5uZXxoQ5ML2j5FO7F3Gg/mRtMZxbbJlYQ6v+5epDQNjM n5Lq3s+dNfm15tQ2oBIA17P5DYNEEmlISgVkSdpcQOKiOEcHqQNzNdck7T2wCdMEG9oZ dexLwFOwnISVUTjS32KuV65UKow562lG/lD/A= Received: by 10.151.145.17 with SMTP id x17mr10255997ybn.230.1223406924763; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.137.19 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:15:24 -0400 From: "Lin Sun" To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: dojo-tomcat/jetty6 In-Reply-To: <48EBB431.7040602@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48EBB431.7040602@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think these two portlets are using the dojo-legacy-tomcat/jetty6. Nothing except the javaee5 assemblies lists dojo-tomcat/jetty6 as dependency. Lin On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > I believe only the Debug Views and Plan Creator portlets need Dojo right > now, which I'm going to remove from the JEE5 assemblies and let users > optionally install them, once I've updated the Welcome portlet to include > some information about what optional Console plugins are available.... > > > -Donald > > > Lin Sun wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I don't see dojo-tomcat/jetty6 is used by admin console right now in >> trunk thus I plan to remove it from the javaee5 assembly. Any >> objection? >> >> Whenever we have converted some of our admin console to use >> dojo-tomcat/jetty6, dojo-tomcat/jetty6 should be automatically pulled >> into javaee5 assembly via transitive dependency, similar like >> dojo-legacy-tomcat/jetty6 today. >> >> Lin >> >